| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Acquaintance |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Service provider massage |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Witness's Boyfriend
|
Business associate |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Burt Ocariz
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | A single visit by the witness ('A.') to Mr. Epstein's house. The witness confirms it was 'one tim... | Mr. Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | The witness's boyfriend 'swiped out' her bank account, creating a debt and a need for money. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The witness sought a massage job for which she would be paid $300, motivating her to convince Mr.... | Not specified | View |
| 2017-07-26 | Deposition/interview | A witness is questioned about their knowledge of lawyer Burt Ocariz, prosecutor Marie Villafona, ... | N/A | View |
This document is page 20 of a deposition transcript (page 100 of the full file). The witness describes a brief 10-15 minute meeting with a man named Paul outside a closed Carrabas restaurant because the witness did not want him at their house. The testimony then shifts to the witness describing sexual items ('massagers', 'vibrator', 'long dick') found in a sink. The page concludes with the interviewer asking if the witness remembers the names of girls who came for massages, to which the witness answers 'Yes'.
This document contains pages 30-33 of a deposition transcript, likely of Scott Rothstein (evidenced by mentions of 'RRA entities' and 'Adler'). The witness details the extensive surveillance system installed in their law firm, including cameras in hallways and the shareholder's lounge. Crucially, the witness explicitly admits to engaging in 'significant amount of illegal activity' and hiring former law enforcement (including Ken Jenne) to engender support for these illegal activities and to perform both legitimate and illegitimate tasks.
Page 395 of a deposition transcript (likely Prince Andrew based on context) stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015670. The witness denies under oath having sex with the subject (Virginia Roberts) and denies recalling receiving a waiver to allow a civil lawsuit. However, the witness states they offered to waive the statute of limitations for criminal purposes if a prosecutor found probable cause of an offense.
This document is page 132 of a rough draft deposition transcript marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp. It captures the end of a questioning session where Mr. Simpson asks a witness if an adverse inference can be drawn solely from being on an airplane with a 24-year-old woman, to which the witness replies 'obviously not.' The session concludes at 4:31 p.m. with the attorneys agreeing to discuss logistics for the following day off the record.
This is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021951). The questioning focuses on a flight log showing Alan Dershowitz traveling with a woman named Tatiana. The interrogator questions the witness about Tatiana's age, contrasting the witness's belief that she was '18 or older' with a claim that Dershowitz's wife found on Google that Tatiana was 24. The witness discusses the timeline of flights involving the Dershowitzes and Epstein occurring between 1998 and 2005.
This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition or hearing involving the House Oversight Committee. A witness is being questioned by Mr. Simpson regarding Jeffrey Epstein's use of the Fifth Amendment. The witness testifies that Epstein selectively invoked the Fifth Amendment to protect people 'higher up in the echelon' (specifically citing Professor Dershowitz), while willing to identify 'household people' (citing Alessi) in civil case interrogatories.
This document is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript involving an interrogation by Mr. Simpson. The questioning focuses on establishing the factual basis for allegations concerning 'other minors' known by the witness as of December 30, 2014. Attorney Mr. Scarola interrupts to instruct the witness not to answer based on privilege, leading to a debate about separating privileged legal strategy from non-privileged factual information.
This document is page 17 of a deposition transcript where a witness describes her financial desperation as a motive for seeking a paid 'massage' from Mr. Epstein. She admits it was important to convince Epstein she was over 18 to get the job and details how she was paid $300, using it to cover a debt caused by her boyfriend. The witness also claims that other 'girls' working for Epstein were the primary drivers of recruitment and deception, encouraging others to lie to 'bring in the business'.
A question-and-answer session where the witness describes her financial motivation for seeking a massage job with Mr. Epstein and her belief that other girls were responsible for recruiting and encouraging lying.
This document is a transcript of a question-and-answer session where an interviewer questions a witness about their interactions with Mr. Epstein.
This document is a transcript of a question-and-answer session where an interviewer questions a witness about their interactions with Mr. Epstein.
A question-and-answer session where the witness describes her financial motivation for seeking a massage job with Mr. Epstein and her belief that other girls were responsible for recruiting and encouraging lying.
An attorney questions a witness to establish the authenticity and regular business practice of maintaining a database of invoice information at Shoppers Travel. The witness confirms that a report of Epstein-related invoices from 1999-2006 is accurate and that data was entered contemporaneously with the invoices.
This document is a transcript of a question-and-answer session where an interviewer questions a witness about their interactions with Mr. Epstein.
This document is a transcript of a question-and-answer session where an interviewer questions a witness about their interactions with Mr. Epstein.
An attorney questions a witness about the process of assigning '1B' evidence numbers to seized items, specifically CDs with evidence number 1B-19. Another attorney, Ms. Moe, directs Ms. Drescher to show the witness Government Exhibit 926, which the witness identifies as a photo of a drawer where CDs were found.
A witness is being questioned about conversations they had with a person named Jane regarding her experiences with Jeffrey Epstein. The testimony focuses on the presence of another woman at Epstein's house who made Jane feel more comfortable.
The document is a transcript of a question-and-answer session where a witness is questioned about their knowledge of and relationships with several individuals involved in a federal case. The witness denies knowledge of the alleged events and relationships.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity