This document is page 96 of a rough draft deposition transcript. A witness is being questioned about the basis of their allegations regarding Virginia Roberts and other minors. The witness asserts that the cases were treated as a 'common scheme' of 'criminal conspiracy for international trafficking' involving multiple girls, rather than separate incidents. The questioning lawyer refers to 'Exhibit 2, the motion to join' while asking the witness to refresh their recollection.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown Speaker (Q) | Interrogator/Attorney |
Questioning the witness regarding their allegations and recollection of evidence.
|
| Unknown Speaker (A) | Witness/Deponent |
Answering questions about allegations of international trafficking involving Virginia Roberts and other minors.
|
| Virginia Roberts | Victim/Subject |
Named as a specific individual involved in the allegations of trafficking.
|
| Miss Roberts | Victim/Subject |
Formal reference to Virginia Roberts.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
"what the law refers to as a common scheme or plan in a criminal conspiracy for international trafficking that involved not just a single girl, but multiple girls"Source
"No, I was not treating those separately."Source
"the allegation in this Exhibit 2, the motion to join as to both Miss Roberts and other minors"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,156 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document