May 01, 2020
Deposition/Testimony
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unnamed Interrogator (Q) | person | 12 | View Entity |
| Deponent | person | 8 | View Entity |
| Mr. Simpson | person | 97 | View Entity |
| MR. TEIN | person | 444 | View Entity |
| the witness | person | 200 | View Entity |
| Ghislaine Maxwell (implied) | person | 0 | View Entity |
| Interviewer | person | 24 | View Entity |
| witness | person | 107 | View Entity |
| Jeffrey Epstein (mentioned) | person | 0 | View Entity |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021919.jpg
This document is page 96 of a rough draft deposition transcript. A witness is being questioned about the basis of their allegations regarding Virginia Roberts and other minors. The witness asserts that the cases were treated as a 'common scheme' of 'criminal conspiracy for international trafficking' involving multiple girls, rather than separate incidents. The questioning lawyer refers to 'Exhibit 2, the motion to join' while asking the witness to refresh their recollection.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021834.jpg
This document is page 11 of a rough draft deposition transcript, marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp. The dialogue involves a legal questioning regarding the ethics of including allegations of misconduct in legal pleadings. The witness clarifies the distinction between 'relevant' and 'pertinent' and references Federal Rule 11 regarding the requirement that allegations must not be frivolous.
EFTA00018542.pdf
An email chain involving Geoffrey Berman (USANYS) dated May 27, 2020, discussing video clips of testimony (likely Ghislaine Maxwell's deposition). The email includes a transcript excerpt where the deponent denies ever giving massages to Jeffrey Epstein, the redacted individual, or anyone else.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022151.jpg
This document is an excerpt (page 254) from a book (likely by James Patterson) containing a transcript of a deposition. The deponent (likely Alan Dershowitz based on context) vehemently denies allegations of an encounter with Virginia Roberts at a New Mexico ranch. The deponent accuses attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell of suborning perjury by pressuring Roberts into making false allegations. The deponent claims a friend of Roberts called him to confirm that Roberts did not want to mention him but was forced to by her lawyers.
DOJ-OGR-00033028.jpg
This document is page 40 of a deposition transcript (stamped DOJ-OGR-00033028) involving the cross-examination of a witness by Mr. Tein. The questioning focuses on sexual acts (masturbation) and whether the witness previously lied to the police. The witness admits that while she told police Epstein did not touch her, that statement was not 'fully truthful,' and she confirms in this testimony that Epstein did, in fact, touch her.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021931.jpg
This is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021931). Mr. Simpson questions a witness about the seriousness of accusing an adult of sex with a minor and the harm caused by false allegations to victims' rights. The questioning specifically focuses on the witness's previous statements and inferences regarding allegations that Professor Dershowitz engaged in misconduct.
DOJ-OGR-00033085.jpg
This document is page 97 of a deposition transcript produced by Consor & Associates. A witness is being questioned about whether she has text messaged FBI agents or federal prosecutors, or if they have shared information with her regarding what 'other girls' have said; she denies both. She also discusses her parents' knowledge of how to contact the FBI, noting that her mother 'doesn't care to know any of this stuff' and mentioning an individual named Paul associated with her mother.
Events with shared participants
A deposition where attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness about a MySpace message (Exhibit 31-001). A recess was taken during the proceedings.
Date unknown • Unspecified deposition location
A legal deposition is taking place where a witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein, with their attorney Mr. Leopold present.
Date unknown • Not specified
A discussion was held 'off the record' during the deposition.
Date unknown • Undetermined
A legal proceeding, likely a deposition, where a direct examination of a witness occurred. The filename '~0929104.TXT' suggests the date.
2004-09-29 • Likely Coconut Grove, FL
Direct examination of a witness by Mr. Tein, indexed to begin on page 4 of the full transcript.
Date unknown
The witness is questioned by Mr. Tein in a legal proceeding.
Date unknown • Not specified (likely a deposition room)
A legal deposition where an unidentified witness is questioned by attorney Mr. Tein.
2010-09-29 • Unknown
Alleged sexual assault incident where an unnamed male ('he') touched the interviewee's back, butt, breast area, and vaginal area over her underwear while he was masturbating. The interviewee was paid $300 during this event.
Date unknown • the house
The deposition or testimony recorded in this transcript took place.
2010-09-29 • undetermined
The narrator's lesbian friend orchestrated a threesome.
Date unknown • Unspecified
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event