Miss Roberts
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR. CASSELL
|
Advocate witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Prince Andrew
|
Accuser accused |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim perpetrator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Victim perpetrator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew
|
Victim accused |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed witness
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-01-01 | Legal settlement | Miss Roberts signed a legal settlement with Jeffrey Epstein. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009183.jpg
This document details two related legal matters. First, it provides an inside account from a juror named Scotty on the deliberations in the Ghislaine Maxwell sex trafficking trial, explaining how the jury reached its verdict. Second, it reports on a court hearing for Prince Andrew, where Judge Kaplan appeared highly skeptical of arguments made by the prince's lawyer, Andrew Brettler, who sought to use a 2009 settlement between victim Virginia Roberts and Jeffrey Epstein to have the case dismissed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021929.jpg
This is a page from a rough draft of a deposition transcript (page 106) stamped by the House Oversight Committee. The exchange is between Mr. Simpson (questioner) and Mr. Cassell (witness). Tensions rise as Cassell defends a lengthy answer, stating he was not filibustering but addressing a matter critical to 'Miss Roberts' involving 'sexual abuse.' Simpson apologizes for attempting humor, acknowledging the intensity of the situation, and compares Cassell's conduct to that of Professor Dershowitz.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021919.jpg
This document is page 96 of a rough draft deposition transcript. A witness is being questioned about the basis of their allegations regarding Virginia Roberts and other minors. The witness asserts that the cases were treated as a 'common scheme' of 'criminal conspiracy for international trafficking' involving multiple girls, rather than separate incidents. The questioning lawyer refers to 'Exhibit 2, the motion to join' while asking the witness to refresh their recollection.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021861.jpg
This document is page 38 of a rough draft deposition transcript (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021861). It details a legal argument regarding attorney/client privilege concerning communications with 'Miss Roberts' (likely Virginia Roberts Giuffre). Attorneys Mr. Simpson, Mr. Scott, and Ms. McCawley discuss the assertion of privilege and the existence of a 'common interest agreement,' with Ms. McCawley objecting to questions seeking details of said written agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021847.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft legal transcript (House Oversight) containing a deposition. The witness confirms that 'Jane Doe Number 3' is Virginia Roberts (spelled Goufrey). The testimony discusses allegations that Professor Dershowitz abused Roberts and potentially other minors. The witness references an 89-page Palm Beach Police Department report that lists 23 or 24 minors who visited Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach mansion during a six-month period in 2005.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021846.jpg
This is a page from a rough draft of a deposition transcript marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp. The questioning focuses on a legal pleading where the witness is listed as counsel, specifically regarding allegations that Alan Dershowitz participated in the abuse of 'Jane Doe Number 3' (identified in the text as Miss Roberts) and was an eyewitness to sexual abuse. The discussion establishes a timeframe of knowledge regarding these allegations on or before December 30, 2014.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Miss Roberts | $500,000.00 | Legal settlement (£370,000) | View |
Confidential communications
Providing legal services
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity