You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
DOJ-OGR-00009376.jpg
401 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
401 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript of a redirect examination in a legal proceeding, filed on February 24, 2022. A witness named Brune is questioned about why they did not investigate an individual further, despite a Westlaw report indicating she was a suspended attorney. The witness explains their belief that the report had conflated two different people with the same name, and they were convinced the person in question was a 'Bronxville stay-at-home wife' and not the lawyer.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune | Witness |
Person being questioned on redirect examination.
|
| Unnamed Witness | Witness |
The person answering questions, designated as 'A'. Believed to be Brune.
|
| Unnamed Questioner | Attorney/Examiner |
The person asking questions, designated as 'Q'.
|
| Unnamed immigration judge's father | Father of an immigration judge |
Mentioned in an email discussed during the testimony.
|
| Unnamed immigration judge | Immigration Judge |
Mentioned in an email discussed during the testimony.
|
| Unnamed suspended lawyer | Suspended Lawyer |
A person whose license status is referenced in a report, who the witness believes is a different person from the subj...
|
| Unnamed Bronxville stay-at-home wife | Stay-at-home wife |
The person the witness was convinced the subject of inquiry was, as opposed to the suspended lawyer.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| New York State Office of Court Administration | Government agency |
Source of information on page 11 of a document, regarding an attorney's license status.
|
| Westlaw | Company |
Source of a report dated May 12th that is a subject of the questioning.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2022-02-24
Redirect examination of a witness named Brune, as recorded in a court transcript.
Unknown, on or around May 12th
A Westlaw report was available on May 12th, which the questioner suggests should have prompted an investigation.
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as part of the 'New York State Office of Court Administration'.
|
|
|
Location of the 'stay-at-home wife' the witness believed the subject to be.
|
Relationships (1)
The document is a transcript of a formal legal questioning (redirect examination) of the witness (Brune) by an examiner.
Key Quotes (1)
"I didn't, but I have to say that I don't believe it would have changed what happened here. By that I mean that this thing to me, without having any particular expertise in these things, looks like it mushed two people with the same name together. I was convinced that she was the Bronxville stay-at-home wife and not the suspended lawyer."Source
— A (Witness Brune)
(Explaining why seeing a Westlaw report about a suspended attorney would not have prompted an investigation, as the witness believed it was a case of mistaken identity.)
DOJ-OGR-00009376.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,295 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 1616-2 Filed 02/24/22 Page 87 of 130
A-5772
A-5772
C2grdau2
Brune - redirect
315
1 immigration judge, her father, correct?
2 A. I certainly read that in the email that we produced.
3 Q. That's what the email says, correct?
4 A. That's what the email says.
5 Q. Going to page 11, it has information from the New York
6 State Office of Court Administration, correct?
7 A. It does.
8 Q. It references license status as a suspended attorney,
9 correct?
10 A. Yes, it does.
11 Q. You have just testified on cross-examination that you
12 didn't think you had anything to investigate about her,
13 correct?
14 A. That's right.
15 Q. If you had seen this Westlaw report on May 12th, you would
16 have thought you had something to investigate, correct?
17 A. I didn't, but I have to say that I don't believe it would
18 have changed what happened here. By that I mean that this
19 thing to me, without having any particular expertise in these
20 things, looks like it mushed two people with the same name
21 together. I was convinced that she was the Bronxville
22 stay-at-home wife and not the suspended lawyer.
23 (Continued on next page)
24
25
Brune - redirect
315
1 immigration judge, her father, correct?
2 A. I certainly read that in the email that we produced.
3 Q. That's what the email says, correct?
4 A. That's what the email says.
5 Q. Going to page 11, it has information from the New York
6 State Office of Court Administration, correct?
7 A. It does.
8 Q. It references license status as a suspended attorney,
9 correct?
10 A. Yes, it does.
11 Q. You have just testified on cross-examination that you
12 didn't think you had anything to investigate about her,
13 correct?
14 A. That's right.
15 Q. If you had seen this Westlaw report on May 12th, you would
16 have thought you had something to investigate, correct?
17 A. I didn't, but I have to say that I don't believe it would
18 have changed what happened here. By that I mean that this
19 thing to me, without having any particular expertise in these
20 things, looks like it mushed two people with the same name
21 together. I was convinced that she was the Bronxville
22 stay-at-home wife and not the suspended lawyer.
23 (Continued on next page)
24
25
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009376
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document