Event Details

Unknown, prior to the main testimony

Description

Cross-examination of the witness, during which they testified they didn't think there was anything to investigate about a certain person.

Participants (1)

Name Type Mentions
Brune person 216 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00009376.jpg

Unknown type • 401 KB
View

This document is a transcript of a redirect examination in a legal proceeding, filed on February 24, 2022. A witness named Brune is questioned about why they did not investigate an individual further, despite a Westlaw report indicating she was a suspended attorney. The witness explains their belief that the report had conflated two different people with the same name, and they were convinced the person in question was a 'Bronxville stay-at-home wife' and not the lawyer.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Ms. Brune is giving testimony under direct examination.

Date unknown • Courtroom

View

A direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding the legal team and paralegals involved in the 'Parma matter'.

Date unknown • Unspecified

View

Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding the jury selection process (voir dire).

Date unknown

View

A past voir dire process is discussed, where the plan was for Judge Pauley to question potential juror Catherine M. Conrad to determine if she was the same person from a court opinion.

Date unknown

View

Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding their legal experience and a specific trial.

Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)

View

The witness, Brune, confirms having conducted many Grand Jury investigations in a past role as an assistant.

Date unknown

View

Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding a colleague's involvement in a trial and his own legal experience.

Date unknown • Court proceeding

View

The witness, Brune, was out of the country.

0015-05-01 • out of the country

View

The witness, Brune, first learned about the voir dire.

0018-07-01

View

Brune confirms he conducted many Grand Jury investigations during his time as an assistant.

Date unknown

View

Event Metadata

Type
Legal Proceeding
Location
Unknown
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
1
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 16:01

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00009376.jpg
Date String
Unknown, prior to the main testimony

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event