A document titled 'The case of the Vibrating Beeper' dated April 2, 2012. It recounts a legal or disciplinary anecdote where the narrator (likely an attorney) helps a medical intern falsely accused of masturbation by demonstrating that the movement in his pocket was actually a vibrating pager signaling his fiancé's arrival. The text concludes with the maxim that demonstrative evidence is superior to oral testimony.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Narrator | Author/Attorney |
Author of the text, likely Alan Dershowitz given the Yeshiva reference and context of these document dumps, who inter...
|
| Guy from Yeshiva | Friend/Father |
Called the narrator to ask for help regarding his son.
|
| The Son | Medical Intern/Doctor |
Suspended for alleged masturbation, later cleared by the narrator.
|
| Nurse | Witness/Accuser |
Misunderstood the doctor's fumbling with a beeper as masturbation.
|
| Fiancé | Partner |
Would call the doctor's beeper to signal she had arrived.
|
| Supervisor | Hospital Administrator |
Witnessed the demonstration of the vibrating beeper and cleared the doctor.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Yeshiva |
School/Community where the narrator knew the father.
|
|
| New York hospital |
Location where the medical intern was working and where the incident occurred.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Source of the document (Footer stamp).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the hospital.
|
"The case of the Vibrating Beeper"Source
"She misunderstood his actions and that of the vibrating beeper for masturbation."Source
"Demonstrative evidence always works better than oral testimony."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,524 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document