| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Cille
|
Professional reporting |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Young
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lieutenant
|
Professional conflict |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
manager
|
Manages supervises |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Compliance Analysts
|
Supervises |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | AUSA's decision to protect young women of Palm Beach, followed by her chastisement by local judge... | Palm Beach | View |
| 2021-05-06 | N/A | Document Deletion | Court Docket | View |
| 2019-08-08 | N/A | Dispute over staffing roster and medical leave at MCC New York | Metropolitan Correctional C... | View |
| 2013-05-28 | N/A | Civilian supervisor reported Snowden's absence to the NSA (delayed report). | Hawaii | View |
| 2009-12-01 | Investigator assignment completion | Investigator Cille completed the assignment related to the Jeffrey E. Epstein case, including the... | 1131 Pine Point Road, West ... | View |
| 2005-10-01 | N/A | Removal of Evidence | Epstein's house | View |
This document from MetroPCS provides information for Law Enforcement Agencies regarding procedures and fees for obtaining customer data. It details the services offered by the Subpoena Compliance Group, retention policies for call records, voicemails, and text messages, and a fee schedule for various data requests. The document specifies that email is the preferred method for submitting requests and receiving results.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. The testimony features witness Young being questioned by Ms. Menninger regarding the timeline of drafting and filing a specific report in late 2019. The Judge intervenes to ensure a specific name is not mentioned in open court, instructing the attorney to use the pseudonym 'Jane' instead.
This document is a page from a report by the DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It outlines the analytical framework and legal standards OPR uses to determine if a Department attorney has committed 'professional misconduct,' exercised 'poor judgment,' or merely made a 'mistake.' It specifically defines the thresholds for intentional violation and reckless disregard of obligations.
This document is page 40 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) from October 29, 2021, arguing for the admissibility of testimony from 'Employee-1'. The text details that Employee-1 will testify that in October 2005, Epstein and a supervisor ordered the removal of computers and contact books from the house. The government argues this testimony proves the defendant's role in the conspiracy, knowledge of the abuse of underage girls, and authenticates exhibits.
This document is an internal request form dated November 30, 2009, from Barbara J. Burns to the Investigations department. It requests an investigator for the case 'State vs. Jeffrey E. Epstein' (Master Case: 2008CF009381AMB), specifically for Subpoena Duces Tecum service and to locate witness Larry Visoski, described as Epstein's helicopter pilot. The charge against Epstein is 'PROCURE PERSON UNDER AGE 18 FOR PROSTITUTION,' and the assignment was completed on December 1, 2009, by an investigator named Cille, with a witness locate address provided in West Palm Beach, FL.
Report entered into the system after supervisor sign-off.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity