DOJ-OGR-00002237.jpg
756 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
756 KB
Summary
This legal document is a court filing from December 30, 2020, detailing a defendant's new motion for bail. The defendant proposes a $28.5 million bail package, secured by property and cash, and co-signed by her spouse, friends, and family, to address the court's previous concerns about flight risk. The proposed conditions also include home confinement with GPS monitoring, custody by a family member, and travel restricted to the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rowe | Defendant |
Mentioned in a cited case, United States v. Rowe.
|
| Petrov | Defendant |
Mentioned in a cited case, United States v. Petrov.
|
| Unnamed Defendant | Defendant |
The subject of the motion, proposing a new set of bail conditions.
|
| Defendant's spouse | Spouse |
Mentioned as a co-signer for a $22.5 million personal recognizance bond.
|
| Defendant’s friends and family members | Acquaintances |
Mentioned as co-signers for five of six additional bonds.
|
| A family member | Third-party custodian |
Proposed to serve as the Defendant's third-party custodian upon release.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court for the Southern District of New York | government agency |
Referenced as S.D.N.Y. in case citations and as a location where the Defendant's travel would be restricted.
|
| United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York | government agency |
Mentioned as a location to which the Defendant's travel would be restricted.
|
| Unnamed security company | company |
A company that would post a bond and provide security services to the Defendant if she were granted bail.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2020-12-30
Document 106 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN.
The Defendant filed a new motion proposing an expansive set of bail conditions to address the Court's concerns about flight risk.
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Abbreviation for the Southern District of New York, mentioned in case citations.
|
|
|
The geographical area to which the Defendant's travel would be restricted.
|
Relationships (3)
The spouse is co-signing a $22.5 million personal recognizance bond for the Defendant.
Friends and family members are willing to co-sign five additional bonds to secure her release.
A family member is proposed to serve as the Defendant's third-party custodian.
Key Quotes (2)
"a release order may be reconsidered even where the evidence proffered on reconsideration was known to the movant at the time of the original hearing."Source
— United States v. Rowe
(Cited as legal precedent to support the court's ability to revisit its own decision on bail.)
DOJ-OGR-00002237.jpg
Quote #1
"Court’s inherent authority for reconsideration of the Court’s previous bail decision"Source
— United States v. Petrov
(Cited as legal precedent noting the court's authority to reconsider a prior bail decision.)
DOJ-OGR-00002237.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,206 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 106 Filed 12/30/20 Page 5 of 22
hearing and that has a material bearing on the issue whether there are conditions of release that will reasonably assure the appearance of such person as required and the safety of any other person and the community.” A court may also revisit its own decision pursuant to its inherent authority, even where the circumstances do not match § 3142(f)’s statutory text. See, e.g., United States v. Rowe, No. 02-CR-756 (LMM), 2003 WL 21196846, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. May 21, 2003) (noting that “a release order may be reconsidered even where the evidence proffered on reconsideration was known to the movant at the time of the original hearing.”); United States v. Petrov, No. 15-CR-66 (LTS), 2015 WL 11022886, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 26, 2015) (noting the “Court’s inherent authority for reconsideration of the Court’s previous bail decision”).
In line with this, the Defendant’s new motion aims to address the reasons that the Court provided when it originally determined that no conditions could reasonably assure her appearance and that pretrial detention was warranted. First, the Defendant proposes a more expansive set of bail conditions that she claims addresses any concerns regarding risk of flight. The newly proposed conditions include a $28.5 million bail package, which consists of a $22.5 million personal recognizance bond co-signed by the Defendant and her spouse and secured by approximately $8 million in property and $500,000 in cash, along with six additional bonds— five co-signed by the Defendant’s friends and family members and the sixth posted by the security company that would provide security services to the Defendant if she were granted bail and transferred to home confinement. See Def. Mot. at 2. The proposed conditions also provide that the Defendant would be released to the custody of a family member, who would serve as her third-party custodian under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(c)(1)(B)(i); that she would be placed in home confinement with GPS monitoring and that her travel would be restricted to the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York and would be limited to appearances in Court, meetings with
5
DOJ-OGR-00002237
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document