Southern and Eastern Districts of New York
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00001227.jpg
This legal document details a court's reasoning for finding a defendant's proposed bail package insufficient to prevent flight risk. Despite proposals for home confinement, GPS monitoring, and custody by a family member, the court concludes that the defendant's vast unrestrained wealth means the financial package does not meaningfully mitigate the possibility of her fleeing.
DOJ-OGR-00001214.jpg
This legal document is a page from a motion arguing for a defendant's release on bail. The defendant proposes a new, comprehensive $28.5 million bail package, secured by property and cash, and co-signed by her spouse, friends, and family. The proposed conditions also include home confinement with GPS monitoring, custody by a family member, and security services, all intended to mitigate the court's previous concerns about her being a flight risk.
DOJ-OGR-00001105.jpg
This legal document outlines a series of proposed conditions for the pretrial release of Ms. Maxwell. The conditions include home confinement in New York City with GPS monitoring, supervision by Pretrial Services, surrender of travel documents, and the presence of 24/7 private security guards paid for by Ms. Maxwell. The document argues that these measures, supported by legal precedent from the Second Circuit, are sufficient to ensure she will not flee and will appear in court.
DOJ-OGR-00002237.jpg
This legal document is a court filing from December 30, 2020, detailing a defendant's new motion for bail. The defendant proposes a $28.5 million bail package, secured by property and cash, and co-signed by her spouse, friends, and family, to address the court's previous concerns about flight risk. The proposed conditions also include home confinement with GPS monitoring, custody by a family member, and travel restricted to the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00013673.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Farmer. The questioning confirms that Farmer, accompanied by her sister, visited Mr. Epstein's house where he advised her on college applications, suggesting UCLA and discussing how summer travel could help. The transcript also reveals that Epstein surprised Farmer with tickets to 'Phantom of the Opera' and that she ultimately attended an Ivy League school.
DOJ-OGR-00010483.jpg
This document is a legal filing arguing for a lenient sentence for Ms. Maxwell. It lists numerous mitigating factors for the Court's consideration, including the non-violent nature of offenses from decades ago (1994-2004), her age, lack of prior criminal history, and the extraordinarily harsh conditions of her 22-month pre-sentence detention during the COVID pandemic. The filing also notes that while Probation agrees a downward variance is warranted, it failed to consider the harsh detention conditions in its justification.
DOJ-OGR-00009981.jpg
This document is an index page from a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, for the legal case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. The index, prepared by Southern District Reporters, covers words from 'weeks' to 'younger' and lists their corresponding page and line numbers in the transcript. The index includes references to individuals named Weiss and Winslow, locations such as Westchester and York, and the legal research service Westlaw.
DOJ-OGR-00020132.jpg
This legal document is part of a motion where a defendant proposes a new, comprehensive bail package to secure release from pretrial detention. The defendant offers a $28.5 million package, secured by property and cash, and co-signed by her spouse, friends, and family, along with conditions like home confinement, GPS monitoring, and restricted travel. The motion cites legal precedents affirming the court's authority to reconsider its previous bail decisions.
DOJ-OGR-00020145.jpg
This legal document is a court filing that analyzes a defendant's proposed bail package. The Court concludes that the package, including a partially secured bond and various release conditions like home confinement, does not sufficiently mitigate the risk of flight. The Court reasons that the defendant's vast unrestrained wealth would plausibly allow her to flee and compensate third parties who supported her bond, and her arguments about illiquid assets are unpersuasive.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity