HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015669.jpg

1000 KB

Extraction Summary

6
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Deposition transcript
File Size: 1000 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a deposition transcript where a witness (questioned by Mr. Edwards) is asked about previous statements regarding Virginia Roberts and potential lawsuits. The witness confirms stating they welcome the opportunity to cross-examine Roberts to prove her allegations are false. The witness also mentions receiving a 'nasty letter' from attorney Mr. Scarola regarding a waiver of the statute of limitations, which the witness declined to answer.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Virginia Roberts Subject/Accuser
Mentioned as believing she has been hurt by the witness or Prince Andrew; witness claims she is lying.
Prince Andrew Subject
Mentioned in a question regarding who may have hurt Virginia Roberts.
Mr. Edwards Attorney (Questioner)
Conducting the questioning of the witness.
Mr. Scott Attorney
Making objections to the form of questions.
Mr. Scarola Attorney
Sent a letter/waiver of statute of limitations to the witness.
Witness (Unidentified in text) Deponent
The person answering questions, denying Virginia Roberts' claims. (Contextually likely Alan Dershowitz based on the s...

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Phipps Reporting
Court reporting service listed in footer.
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.

Timeline (1 events)

N/A
Deposition testimony regarding statements made about Virginia Roberts.
N/A

Relationships (3)

Witness Adversarial Virginia Roberts
Witness claims everything she said is 'totally false' and wants to cross-examine her.
Witness Adversarial/Legal Mr. Scarola
Scarola sent a 'nasty letter' regarding a waiver of statute of limitations to the witness.
Witness Associated Prince Andrew
Grouped together in the question regarding who hurt Virginia Roberts ('hurt by you or Prince Andrew').

Key Quotes (4)

"Virginia believes she has been hurt by you or Prince Andrew, she should be suing for damages?"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015669.jpg
Quote #1
"I know I said that I welcome any opportunity to put Virginia Roberts under oath and to have her cross examined to establish that everything she's said about me is totally false, which I'm confident we can do."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015669.jpg
Quote #2
"Mr. Scarola wrote me a nasty letter that I didn't think it was appropriate to respond to."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015669.jpg
Quote #3
"What I did do is state under oath that she was lying"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015669.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,238 characters)

394
1 Virginia believes she has been hurt by you or Prince
2 Andrew, she should be suing for damages?
3 MR. SCOTT: Objection, form.
4 A. I don't recall.
5 BY MR. EDWARDS:
6 Q. Have you ever said, "I welcome that
7 lawsuit"?
8 MR. SCOTT: Objection, form. You should
9 identify what you're publishing from.
10 MR. EDWARDS: I'm asking if he's ever made
11 the statement to anybody other than his
12 lawyers.
13 A. I know I said that I welcome any
14 opportunity to put Virginia Roberts under oath and
15 to have her cross examined to establish that
16 everything she's said about me is totally false,
17 which I'm confident we can do.
18 BY MR. EDWARDS:
19 Q. After making that statement, were you
20 presented by Mr. Scarola, I believe, with a waiver
21 of the statute of limitations in order to oblige you
22 on filing that lawsuit?
23 A. Mr. Scarola wrote me a nasty letter that I
24 didn't think it was appropriate to respond to. What
25 I did do is state under oath that she was lying and
www.phippsreporting.com
(888) 811-3408
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015669

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document