This document is a page from a deposition transcript where a witness (questioned by Mr. Edwards) is asked about previous statements regarding Virginia Roberts and potential lawsuits. The witness confirms stating they welcome the opportunity to cross-examine Roberts to prove her allegations are false. The witness also mentions receiving a 'nasty letter' from attorney Mr. Scarola regarding a waiver of the statute of limitations, which the witness declined to answer.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Virginia Roberts | Subject/Accuser |
Mentioned as believing she has been hurt by the witness or Prince Andrew; witness claims she is lying.
|
| Prince Andrew | Subject |
Mentioned in a question regarding who may have hurt Virginia Roberts.
|
| Mr. Edwards | Attorney (Questioner) |
Conducting the questioning of the witness.
|
| Mr. Scott | Attorney |
Making objections to the form of questions.
|
| Mr. Scarola | Attorney |
Sent a letter/waiver of statute of limitations to the witness.
|
| Witness (Unidentified in text) | Deponent |
The person answering questions, denying Virginia Roberts' claims. (Contextually likely Alan Dershowitz based on the s...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Phipps Reporting |
Court reporting service listed in footer.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
"Virginia believes she has been hurt by you or Prince Andrew, she should be suing for damages?"Source
"I know I said that I welcome any opportunity to put Virginia Roberts under oath and to have her cross examined to establish that everything she's said about me is totally false, which I'm confident we can do."Source
"Mr. Scarola wrote me a nasty letter that I didn't think it was appropriate to respond to."Source
"What I did do is state under oath that she was lying"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,238 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document