| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR. SCAROLA
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. SCAROLA
|
Opposing counsel likely |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Deposition testimony regarding statements made about Virginia Roberts. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Mr. Cassell | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition testimony regarding privilege and common interest agreements | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | A request was made for a copy of an entry from Professor Dershowitz's book. | Unknown | View |
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where a witness (questioned by Mr. Edwards) is asked about previous statements regarding Virginia Roberts and potential lawsuits. The witness confirms stating they welcome the opportunity to cross-examine Roberts to prove her allegations are false. The witness also mentions receiving a 'nasty letter' from attorney Mr. Scarola regarding a waiver of the statute of limitations, which the witness declined to answer.
This document is page 13 of a legal response in the case of Edwards vs. Dershowitz (Case No. CACE 15-000072). It contains a transcript excerpt from a deposition where Alan Dershowitz questions Ms. McCawley's standing, followed by legal commentary regarding a statement released by Ms. McCawley on behalf of David Boies concerning privileged settlement discussions. The document references depositions of Alan Dershowitz from 2015 and 2016.
This document appears to be a scanned page from a book (specifically 'The 4-Hour Workweek' by Tim Ferriss, though the author is not named on this specific page) labeled as 'Step III: A is for Automation' and Chapter 8 'Outsourcing Life'. It contains quotes from Star Trek and Henry David Thoreau concerning automation and simplicity. The page is stamped with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013870', indicating it was included as evidence or an exhibit in a House Oversight Committee investigation, likely related to the Epstein files given the user context.
This is page 131 of a rough draft deposition transcript from a House Oversight investigation. Attorney Mr. Simpson is questioning a witness identified as Mr. Cassell about the legality of a romantic relationship between a middle-aged man and a 24-year-old. The proceedings are interrupted by Mr. Scarola noting the time is 4:30, leading to a tense exchange between Mr. Scarola and Mr. Scott regarding whether Mr. Scott is smiling.
This is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021907). A witness testifies that flight logs produced by Mr. Dershowitz to Detective Riccari of the Palm Beach Police Department were 'incomplete and inaccurate,' raising concerns that Dershowitz had 'sanitized' the logs. The witness further mentions receiving additional flight logs from an individual named Dave Rogers for comparison.
This document is page 83 of a rough draft deposition transcript. A witness testifies that pilot Dave Rogers produced flight logs during sex abuse litigation against Epstein. The witness notes that when these logs were compared to logs provided by Mr. Dershowitz to the Palm Beach Police Department, inconsistencies were found, arousing suspicion. The testimony is briefly interrupted by Mr. Scott, who reports receiving a call from Epstein's lawyer, Darrin Indyke, regarding technical phone issues.
This document is page 38 of a rough draft deposition transcript (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021861). It details a legal argument regarding attorney/client privilege concerning communications with 'Miss Roberts' (likely Virginia Roberts Giuffre). Attorneys Mr. Simpson, Mr. Scott, and Ms. McCawley discuss the assertion of privilege and the existence of a 'common interest agreement,' with Ms. McCawley objecting to questions seeking details of said written agreement.
Page 9 of a rough draft transcript from a House Oversight investigation. Mr. Scarola and the Witness request access to communications involving 'Rebecca' and Professor Dershowitz before proceeding. Mr. Simpson argues the documents are unnecessary as he intends to avoid questions specifically about those communications, noting the Witness was present for Dershowitz's prior testimony.
This is page 8 of a rough draft deposition transcript. The text begins with a procedural discussion between a questioner and a witness regarding how questions should be answered. Mr. Scarola interrupts to ask about a document placed before him, which Mr. Scott confirms is a copy of an entry from Professor Dershowitz's book, provided in response to a request made during a previous deposition.
Indyke called to say his phone is not working.
Mr. Scott provided a copy of an entry from Professor Dershowitz's book to Mr. Scarola, fulfilling a request made in a previous deposition.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity