DOJ-OGR-00000518.jpg

599 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
3
Locations
3
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 599 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript where a judge is addressing the legal parties in a case involving Mr. Epstein. The judge requests information on any other legal proceedings in Florida, the Virgin Islands, or New Mexico related to Epstein's sex offender status. The judge also discusses a 'cursory' and unhelpful financial summary of Epstein's assets submitted by the defense, stating an inclination to place it on the public docket and asking for arguments from both sides.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Judge Pickholz Judge
Mentioned in reference to a prior ruling on 1-18-2011 in a comparable proceeding.
Mr. Epstein Subject of legal proceedings
The document discusses legal proceedings related to his sex offender status and a financial summary of his assets.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Court Government agency
The defense submitted a financial summary of Mr. Epstein's assets to the Court.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.

Timeline (3 events)

2011-01-18
Judge Pickholz made a ruling in a proceeding that the current judge considers comparable.
2019-07-24
A judge discusses the need for transcripts and considers placing a financial summary on the public docket.
Court
Unnamed Judge Defense Government
The defense submitted a brief financial summary of Mr. Epstein's assets to the Court under seal.
Court
Defense

Locations (3)

Location Context
Mentioned as a possible location for legal or administrative proceedings involving Mr. Epstein.
Mentioned as a possible location for legal or administrative proceedings involving Mr. Epstein.
Mentioned as a possible location for a pending proceeding involving Mr. Epstein.

Key Quotes (3)

"I'm looking for any transcripts in particular and administrative or legal proceedings in other states relating in any way to Mr. Epstein's sex offender status."
Source
— Unnamed Judge (The judge clarifying the information being sought from the attorneys.)
DOJ-OGR-00000518.jpg
Quote #1
"The summary is cursory I would say, short, less than a page and does not fully assist me in rendering the bail/remand decision, that is to say, in its detail or absence of detail."
Source
— Unnamed Judge (The judge's assessment of the financial summary submitted by the defense.)
DOJ-OGR-00000518.jpg
Quote #2
"So I am inclined to place the summary on the docket, but I want to hear from both sides whether I should or should"
Source
— Unnamed Judge (The judge stating their intention regarding the financial summary and seeking input from the legal parties.)
DOJ-OGR-00000518.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,496 characters)

Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 8 of 74 8
legal or administrative proceedings in Florida, the Virgin
Islands, New Mexico, and any other jurisdiction comparable to
the one before Judge Pickholz in which she ruled on 1-18-2011.
So I'm not suggesting that there are, although I think
I did read someplace that there may be some proceeding pending
in New Mexico. I'm not quite sure. That's what I hoped you
could help me out on.
It doesn't have to be precisely the same proceeding
that Judge Pickholz had. I'm looking for any transcripts in
particular and administrative or legal proceedings in other
states relating in any way to Mr. Epstein's sex offender
status.
The third question on my mind is this: The defense
has submitted a brief financial summary to the Court of
Mr. Epstein's assets. And I, as you know, permitted that it be
submitted under seal for, among other reasons that were on my
mind, not to slow the proceedings down.
The summary is cursory I would say, short, less than a
page and does not fully assist me in rendering the bail/remand
decision, that is to say, in its detail or absence of detail.
And moreover, the information provided in that summary seems to
be known already to the government in other ways. They seem to
have gotten that information from other sources.
So I am inclined to place the summary on the docket,
but I want to hear from both sides whether I should or should
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00000518

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document