This document is the final page of a letter dated June 5, 2006, from attorney Gerald B. Lefcourt to Ms. Lanna Belohlavek. Lefcourt argues that a plea to felony aggravated assault for his client is unwarranted and risks a sex offender classification. He proposes that, based on witness credibility issues, psycho-sexual evaluations, and lie detector tests, a misdemeanor plea to solicitation is the most appropriate resolution.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Gerald B. Lefcourt | Attorney |
Author of the letter, representing a client in a legal case. His name appears on the letterhead and as the signatory.
|
| Lanna Belohlavek |
Recipient of the letter.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| LAW OFFICES OF GERALD B. LEFCOURT, P.C. | company |
Appears as the letterhead, indicating the law firm from which the letter was sent.
|
| DOJ-OGR | government agency |
Appears in the document control number 'DOJ-OGR-00030482' at the bottom of the page.
|
"Under the circumstances of this case a plea to felony aggravated assault is both unwarranted and presents a grave risk the client will be brandished a sex offender, bearing the attendant burdens inherent with that classification. In light of this, and the credibility issues presented by the complaining witnesses, combined with the client's two psycho-sexual evaluations and lie detector tests, we believe that at the very most, a misdemeanor plea to solicitation is appropriate."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (735 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document