GERALD B. LEFCOURT
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
LANNA BELOHLAVEK
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Unnamed Client
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
LANNA BELOHLAVEK
|
Professional opposing counsel |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Client
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
The Client (Epstein)
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JACK A. GOLDBERGER
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
FAF
|
Professional |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-07-06 | N/A | Date of a letter co-authored by Alan Dershowitz and Gerald Lefcourt regarding Epstein. | N/A | View |
EFTA00007091.pdf
This document packet contains legal correspondence from May 2007 regarding subpoenas issued to Epstein-affiliated companies JEGE, Inc. and Hyperion Air, Inc. Attorney Jack Goldberger confirms a deadline extension and clarifies that he, Lilly Ann Sanchez, and Gerald Lefcourt are representing the corporations. The packet also includes an inventory of audiotapes (likely wiretaps or controlled calls) with quality notes, and a handwritten breakdown of phone records analyzing calls to and from the 'Epstein Residence' and other redacted parties.
EFTA00001946.pdf
A photograph of a letter dated November 1, 2007, from Faith A. Friedman of the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt to attorneys Roy Black and Jack Goldberger regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The letter discusses depositions and is accompanied by three black binders labeled 'DEPO MATERIAL' or 'DEPO MATERIALS' with names redacted. The document indicates coordination between Epstein's legal defense team regarding deposition materials.
EFTA00001913.pdf
A privileged legal memorandum dated August 23, 2007, from FAF to GBL (Gerald B. Lefcourt), SER, and File. The document originates from the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C. The subject line references Palm Beach, but the specific details and the entire content of the memo are heavily redacted. Handwritten notes mention 'Epstein', 'Paul', and 'Living', and an underlying document references Victoria B. Eiger.
DOJ-OGR-00033208.tif
This document is a privileged and confidential attorney work product memorandum dated December 20, 2006, from the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C. to Jeffrey Epstein. It discusses alleged inaccuracies and material omissions in Palm Beach Police Department (PBPD) reports and probable cause affidavits concerning Epstein's case, particularly referencing a polygraph examination from May 2, 2006, and the definition of 'sexual contact'.
DOJ-OGR-00030488.jpg
A legal letter from defense attorney Gerald Lefcourt to prosecutor Lanna Belohlavek dated June 5, 2006. The letter argues that the State's case against the client (implied Jeffrey Epstein) has weakened due to severe credibility issues with three key witnesses, citing theft, drug use, and fraud. Lefcourt emphasizes that his client has passed a lie detector test and provided favorable psycho-sexual evaluations.
DOJ-OGR-00030484.jpg
This legal document, a letter from the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt to Ms. Lanna Belohlavek dated June 5, 2006, analyzes the significant risk that a client's potential plea to aggravated assault in Florida could trigger mandatory sex offender registration. The analysis covers the specific laws and registration requirements in the client's primary residence of the Virgin Islands, secondary domicile of New York, and other states like Oklahoma and Montana, highlighting how different jurisdictions interpret and apply their statutes to out-of-state convictions.
DOJ-OGR-00030483.jpg
This letter, dated June 5, 2006, is from Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Gerald B. Lefcourt, to prosecutor Lanna Belohlavek of the Florida State Attorney's Office. Following up on a recent meeting, the attorney argues against Epstein pleading to a felony aggravated assault charge, primarily due to the risk of mandatory sex offender registration. The letter proposes a plea to misdemeanor solicitation as a more suitable resolution and addresses legal arguments to support this, including that the victim need not be legally defined as a "prostitute" for the charge to apply.
DOJ-OGR-00030482.jpg
This document is the final page of a letter dated June 5, 2006, from attorney Gerald B. Lefcourt to Ms. Lanna Belohlavek. Lefcourt argues that a plea to felony aggravated assault for his client is unwarranted and risks a sex offender classification. He proposes that, based on witness credibility issues, psycho-sexual evaluations, and lie detector tests, a misdemeanor plea to solicitation is the most appropriate resolution.
DOJ-OGR-00030481.jpg
This is page 6 of a letter dated June 5, 2006, from attorney Gerald B. Lefcourt to Lanna Belohlavek. Lefcourt argues that the State's case against his client has significantly weakened since a meeting on February 16, 2006, by systematically discrediting a key witness. He lists numerous alleged issues with the witness, including a history of theft, prostitution, drug use, and lying, while contrasting this with his client, who has passed a lie detector test and provided favorable psycho-sexual evaluations.
DOJ-OGR-00030480.jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal letter dated June 5, 2006, from the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt to Ms. Lanna Belohlavek. The letter argues against an aggravated assault charge in a specific case, contending that the facts do not align with the legal definition of a violent felony, as there was no suggestion of serious bodily harm or a deadly weapon. The argument is supported by legal citations, including Florida case law and the FBI's Uniform Crime Report, to demonstrate that a plea to aggravated assault would be inappropriate.
DOJ-OGR-00030478.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal letter dated June 5, 2006, from the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt to Ms. Lanna Belohlavek. It provides a legal analysis of sex offender registration laws in New York, California, Colorado, and Florida, particularly concerning convictions from other jurisdictions. The letter highlights that courts in states like New York and California may examine the underlying conduct of an offense, rather than just its formal elements, to determine if registration is required.
DOJ-OGR-00030477.jpg
This legal memo, dated June 5, 2006, from the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt to Lanna Belohlavek, analyzes the severe risk that a client's potential plea to aggravated assault in Florida would trigger mandatory sex offender registration. The analysis covers the client's primary residence in the Virgin Islands and secondary domicile in New York, both of which have broad registration statutes, and also notes similar requirements in other states like Oklahoma and Montana, highlighting the far-reaching consequences of the plea.
DOJ-OGR-00023096.jpg
This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing the final days of plea negotiations between the USAO and Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in August 2007. It includes a transcript of a letter signed by Matthew Menchel (on behalf of U.S. Attorney Acosta) setting a non-negotiable two-year incarceration term and an August 17 deadline. The narrative explains that the deadline was set to allow prosecutor Villafaña time to investigate Epstein's assistants and computers in New York if the deal was rejected, and notes that Menchel sent this letter on his final day at the USAO.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029501.jpg
This document is an email chain from June 2016 in which Alan Dershowitz forwards a media inquiry from Fox News reporter Malia Zimmerman to Jeffrey Epstein (using the address jeevacation@gmail.com) and attorneys Martin Weinberg and Gerald Lefcourt. Zimmerman is inquiring about a July 2007 letter co-authored by Dershowitz and Lefcourt which claimed Epstein was part of the 'original group that conceived the Clinton Global Initiative.' Zimmerman asks for clarification on Epstein's specific official capacity (board member, founder, etc.) with the foundation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029420.jpg
This document, part of a 2017 House Oversight filing, recounts the conflict between Palm Beach police and the State Attorney regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. It details how police sought serious molestation charges, but State Attorney Barry Krischer presented lesser charges to a grand jury, leading to accusations of preferential treatment. The text also highlights Epstein's high-profile connections, including Bill Clinton and Alan Dershowitz, and financial ties to Harvard and politicians like Eliot Spitzer and Bill Richardson.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021784.jpg
This document, likely a page from a news article filed in House Oversight records, summarizes the conflict between Palm Beach police and the State Attorney regarding the indictment of Jeffrey Epstein. It details how Police Chief Reiter accused State Attorney Krischer of preferential treatment for Epstein. The text outlines Epstein's high-profile connections (Clinton, Harvard), his legal defense strategy led by Gerald Lefcourt and Alan Dershowitz, and provides specific graphic details of the allegations made by a 14-year-old victim who was recruited by Haley Robson.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021772.jpg
This document appears to be a news article or report summary detailing the 2006 investigation into Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach. It highlights the conflict between the police (who sought serious molestation charges) and the State Attorney (who pursued lesser solicitation charges), allegations of preferential treatment due to Epstein's wealth and connections, and the political fallout involving returned donations. It also outlines Epstein's defense strategy led by Gerald Lefcourt and Alan Dershowitz.
Defense arguments regarding witness credibility and plea ...
Letter arguing that the State's case has weakened due to witness credibility issues and highlighting the client's polygraph results.
Conclusion regarding a plea in a criminal case
Attorney Gerald B. Lefcourt concludes his argument against a felony aggravated assault plea for his client, citing the risk of a sex offender classification and witness credibility issues. He proposes that a misdemeanor plea to solicitation is more appropriate based on psycho-sexual evaluations and lie detector tests.
Conclusion regarding a plea in a criminal case
Attorney Gerald B. Lefcourt concludes his argument against a felony aggravated assault plea for his client, citing the risk of a sex offender classification and witness credibility issues. He proposes that a misdemeanor plea to solicitation is more appropriate based on psycho-sexual evaluations and lie detector tests.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity