LAW OFFICES OF GERALD B. LEFCOURT, P.C.
OrganizationRelationship Network
EFTA00001946.pdf
A photograph of a letter dated November 1, 2007, from Faith A. Friedman of the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt to attorneys Roy Black and Jack Goldberger regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The letter discusses depositions and is accompanied by three black binders labeled 'DEPO MATERIAL' or 'DEPO MATERIALS' with names redacted. The document indicates coordination between Epstein's legal defense team regarding deposition materials.
EFTA00001913.pdf
A privileged legal memorandum dated August 23, 2007, from FAF to GBL (Gerald B. Lefcourt), SER, and File. The document originates from the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C. The subject line references Palm Beach, but the specific details and the entire content of the memo are heavily redacted. Handwritten notes mention 'Epstein', 'Paul', and 'Living', and an underlying document references Victoria B. Eiger.
EFTA00000476.pdf
The document consists of a Cash Disbursements journal for Jeffrey Epstein for September 2006 and a project status report from an associate named Pinto. The financial ledger details significant payments to legal defense firms (Black Srebnick, Lefcourt) totaling over $2 million cumulatively, a $100,000 payment to an investigative firm, and large tax payments to the Virgin Islands. It also lists 'Gifts' to various individuals including Andrea Mitrovich and Thomas Magnani. The bottom document tracks logistical projects including shipping containers to Little St. James ('LSJ'), car deliveries to NY, and construction planning meetings involving 'JE' and Amerling.
DOJ-OGR-00033208.tif
This document is a privileged and confidential attorney work product memorandum dated December 20, 2006, from the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C. to Jeffrey Epstein. It discusses alleged inaccuracies and material omissions in Palm Beach Police Department (PBPD) reports and probable cause affidavits concerning Epstein's case, particularly referencing a polygraph examination from May 2, 2006, and the definition of 'sexual contact'.
DOJ-OGR-00030488.jpg
A legal letter from defense attorney Gerald Lefcourt to prosecutor Lanna Belohlavek dated June 5, 2006. The letter argues that the State's case against the client (implied Jeffrey Epstein) has weakened due to severe credibility issues with three key witnesses, citing theft, drug use, and fraud. Lefcourt emphasizes that his client has passed a lie detector test and provided favorable psycho-sexual evaluations.
DOJ-OGR-00030486.jpg
This legal letter, dated June 5, 2006, from the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt to Ms. Lanna Belohlavek, analyzes the significant risk that their client could be subjected to sex offender registration laws (Megan's Law). The analysis focuses on Florida law but also considers risks in other jurisdictions like the Virgin Islands and New Jersey, highlighting a national trend of expanding such statutes and citing recent court decisions and news articles as evidence. The letter warns that even a plea to aggravated assault carries a grave risk of future registration requirements and associated burdens for the client.
DOJ-OGR-00030484.jpg
This legal document, a letter from the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt to Ms. Lanna Belohlavek dated June 5, 2006, analyzes the significant risk that a client's potential plea to aggravated assault in Florida could trigger mandatory sex offender registration. The analysis covers the specific laws and registration requirements in the client's primary residence of the Virgin Islands, secondary domicile of New York, and other states like Oklahoma and Montana, highlighting how different jurisdictions interpret and apply their statutes to out-of-state convictions.
DOJ-OGR-00030483.jpg
This letter, dated June 5, 2006, is from Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Gerald B. Lefcourt, to prosecutor Lanna Belohlavek of the Florida State Attorney's Office. Following up on a recent meeting, the attorney argues against Epstein pleading to a felony aggravated assault charge, primarily due to the risk of mandatory sex offender registration. The letter proposes a plea to misdemeanor solicitation as a more suitable resolution and addresses legal arguments to support this, including that the victim need not be legally defined as a "prostitute" for the charge to apply.
DOJ-OGR-00030482.jpg
This document is the final page of a letter dated June 5, 2006, from attorney Gerald B. Lefcourt to Ms. Lanna Belohlavek. Lefcourt argues that a plea to felony aggravated assault for his client is unwarranted and risks a sex offender classification. He proposes that, based on witness credibility issues, psycho-sexual evaluations, and lie detector tests, a misdemeanor plea to solicitation is the most appropriate resolution.
DOJ-OGR-00030481.jpg
This is page 6 of a letter dated June 5, 2006, from attorney Gerald B. Lefcourt to Lanna Belohlavek. Lefcourt argues that the State's case against his client has significantly weakened since a meeting on February 16, 2006, by systematically discrediting a key witness. He lists numerous alleged issues with the witness, including a history of theft, prostitution, drug use, and lying, while contrasting this with his client, who has passed a lie detector test and provided favorable psycho-sexual evaluations.
DOJ-OGR-00030480.jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal letter dated June 5, 2006, from the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt to Ms. Lanna Belohlavek. The letter argues against an aggravated assault charge in a specific case, contending that the facts do not align with the legal definition of a violent felony, as there was no suggestion of serious bodily harm or a deadly weapon. The argument is supported by legal citations, including Florida case law and the FBI's Uniform Crime Report, to demonstrate that a plea to aggravated assault would be inappropriate.
DOJ-OGR-00030478.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal letter dated June 5, 2006, from the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt to Ms. Lanna Belohlavek. It provides a legal analysis of sex offender registration laws in New York, California, Colorado, and Florida, particularly concerning convictions from other jurisdictions. The letter highlights that courts in states like New York and California may examine the underlying conduct of an offense, rather than just its formal elements, to determine if registration is required.
DOJ-OGR-00030477.jpg
This legal memo, dated June 5, 2006, from the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt to Lanna Belohlavek, analyzes the severe risk that a client's potential plea to aggravated assault in Florida would trigger mandatory sex offender registration. The analysis covers the client's primary residence in the Virgin Islands and secondary domicile in New York, both of which have broad registration statutes, and also notes similar requirements in other states like Oklahoma and Montana, highlighting the far-reaching consequences of the plea.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity