This document is page 3 of a table of contents for a 2013 publication called 'Tax Topics,' listing articles from 2010 and 2011. The articles cover complex U.S. tax and estate planning subjects, such as specific legal cases, legislative acts, and tax planning strategies (e.g., GRATs). While the document itself does not mention Jeffrey Epstein or his known associates, its focus on sophisticated wealth and estate tax law is relevant to the financial activities of high-net-worth individuals, and its identifier 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022332' indicates it was collected as part of a congressional investigation.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Baker | Subject of legal case |
Mentioned in the legal case 'Matter of Baker' regarding New York statutory residency for income tax purposes.
|
| President | Government Official |
Mentioned in reference to the President's Deficit Commission.
|
| Tatum | Subject of legal case |
Mentioned in the legal case 'Estate of Tatum' concerning a disclaimer.
|
| Carlton | Subject of legal case |
Mentioned in 'Carlton, a 1994 Supreme Court estate tax case'.
|
| Breakiron | Subject of legal case |
Mentioned in a case where a taxpayer successfully rescinded disclaimers.
|
| Bosch | Subject of legal case |
Mentioned in a vintage case addressing when a state law holding is binding on the IRS.
|
| Hendrix | Subject of legal case |
Mentioned in a case involving purported charitable gifts and a skeptical IRS.
|
| Sen. Bernie Sanders | Politician |
Mentioned in relation to his estate tax bill and its revenue raisers.
|
| Sen. Kyl | Politician |
Mentioned in relation to his estate tax proposal.
|
| Rep. Ryan | Politician |
Mentioned in relation to his 'Roadmap' proposal.
|
| Schneider | Party in legal case |
Mentioned in the legal case 'Schneider v. Finnman'.
|
| Finnman | Party in legal case |
Mentioned in the legal case 'Schneider v. Finnman'.
|
| Pierre | Party in legal case |
Mentioned in the legal cases 'Pierre v. Commissioner' and 'Pierre II'.
|
| Ludwick | Party in legal case |
Mentioned in the legal case 'Ludwick v. Commissioner'.
|
| President Obama | President of the United States |
Mentioned in relation to his FY 2011 Budget proposals for estate and gift tax.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| President's Deficit Commission |
Source of reports on 'tax expenditures' and tax reform.
|
|
| National Taxpayer Advocate |
Source of reports on 'tax expenditures' and tax reform.
|
|
| Supreme Court |
Mentioned in reference to the 1994 'Carlton' estate tax case.
|
|
| IRS (Internal Revenue Service) |
Mentioned in the context of state law holdings being binding on it, and its skepticism towards certain charitable gifts.
|
|
| Free Fertility Foundation |
Mentioned in a case involving purported charitable gifts.
|
|
| Tax Court |
Mentioned as addressing the 'step transaction doctrine' in the 'Pierre II' case.
|
|
| HOUSE_OVERSIGHT |
Appears as a document identifier ('HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022332'), likely referring to the U.S. House Committee on Oversigh...
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Discussed in the context of what it means to be a 'statutory resident' for income tax purposes.
|
"statutory resident"Source
"estate planning glossary"Source
"tax expenditures"Source
"PEP"Source
"Pease"Source
"PAYGO"Source
"Roadmap"Source
"privity"Source
"Pierre II"Source
"step transaction doctrine"Source
"economic substance doctrine"Source
"check-the-box"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (3,079 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document