Sen. Kyl
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-07-01 | N/A | Round-up of the tax landscape, including bills and proposals from Sen. Sanders, Sen. Kyl, and Rep... | N/A | View |
| 2004-10-09 | N/A | Statement by Sen. Kyl in the Congressional Record regarding victim safety. | Congress | View |
| 2004-10-09 | N/A | Statement by Sen. Kyl in Congressional Record. | Congress | View |
| 2004-04-22 | N/A | Statement by Sen. Kyl regarding appropriations for the National Crime Victims Law Institution. | Congress (Congressional Rec... | View |
| 2004-04-22 | N/A | Statement by Sen. Kyl in the Congressional Record | Congress | View |
| 2004-01-01 | N/A | Passage/Discussion of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) | US Congress | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017761.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article, produced by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It discusses legal frameworks for appointing counsel for crime victims (specifically children and those facing potential charges) and proposes rules for victims' rights to be heard regarding a defendant's release from custody. It cites the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and various U.S. Codes regarding funding and legal authority.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017758.jpg
This document discusses the application of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) regarding victim notification, resentencing, and attendance at trials, particularly in cases with multiple victims like the Oklahoma City bombing. It outlines proposed rules for handling victim rights when large numbers make standard procedures impracticable and addresses the victim's right to be heard on issues directly affecting them. Extensive footnotes provide legal citations and commentary on relevant statutes and case law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017755.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically focusing on a victim's right to attend court proceedings and be heard. The text analyzes the rationale behind allowing victims to be present during trials and cites various state constitutions and federal rules (Rule 615). The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen in the footer and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was used as legal research or an exhibit in proceedings related to the investigation of the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, likely concerning the violation of victims' rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017753.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article (page 39 of 52 in the exhibit), stamped with a House Oversight Bates number and the name David Schoen. It outlines Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure regarding sentencing hearings, specifically focusing on the handling of objections to presentence reports and the rights of victims to be heard and participate in the process. The text emphasizes that victims have rights independent of the government or the defendant.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017733.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 Brigham Young University Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and Rule 11. It argues for a rule change requiring prosecutors to notify victims of plea negotiations and for courts to consider victims' views before accepting plea agreements. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of an investigation into the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement, which was criticized for violating these exact principles of victim notification.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017724.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article, likely submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It analyzes the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), detailing specific rights afforded to victims, such as the right to be heard and the right to restitution, and argues that the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure must be amended to reflect these statutory rights. The text cites Senators Kyl and Feinstein and references the Oklahoma City bombing case as a catalyst for the legislation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017698.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (likely authored by Paul Cassell) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It argues for rules allowing closed-circuit transmission of proceedings for victims (citing the Oklahoma City bombing case) and mandating victim notification. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was submitted as part of a congressional inquiry, likely related to the handling of victims' rights in the Jeffrey Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017694.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (likely by Paul Cassell) included in files produced by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It discusses legal arguments regarding the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Rules 60 and 48) specifically concerning the rights of victims to be heard during release hearings and case dismissals. The text critiques the Advisory Committee's approach as an 'empty gesture' and advocates for stronger requirements for courts to consider victims' views.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017689.jpg
This document is page 54 of 78 from a submission to the House Oversight Committee, bearing the name of Epstein's attorney, David Schoen. The content is a reproduction of a 2007 Utah Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically focusing on victim impact statements, sentencing guidelines, and the split between different Circuit courts regarding notice requirements for upward departures in sentencing. This legal context is highly relevant to the Epstein case, as the violation of CVRA rights (failure to notify victims of the plea deal) was a central point of contention in the scrutiny of his Non-Prosecution Agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017664.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 29 of 78 in the evidence file) discussing amendments to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure regarding victims' rights. It specifically details proposals for Rule 17 to protect victims from abusive subpoenas of their confidential information by defense attorneys, citing the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The document bears the name 'David Schoen' and a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of the congressional investigation into the handling of the Epstein case (likely related to the non-prosecution agreement and victims' rights violations).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017642.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article, likely authored by Paul Cassell, discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to integrate victim rights. It details the author's submission of twenty-eight changes to the Advisory Committee in 2005 and the subsequent limited adoption of these changes by a subcommittee chaired by Judge James Jones. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022332.jpg
This document is page 3 of a table of contents for a 2013 publication called 'Tax Topics,' listing articles from 2010 and 2011. The articles cover complex U.S. tax and estate planning subjects, such as specific legal cases, legislative acts, and tax planning strategies (e.g., GRATs). While the document itself does not mention Jeffrey Epstein or his known associates, its focus on sophisticated wealth and estate tax law is relevant to the financial activities of high-net-worth individuals, and its identifier 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022332' indicates it was collected as part of a congressional investigation.
CVRA Intent
Statement regarding making the victim an independent participant.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity