A letter from defense attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The defense requests the court vacate a recent order granting the plaintiff anonymity, not to oppose the anonymity itself, but to ensure they have the opportunity to respond regarding the specific terms of that anonymity to protect their defense rights, citing a previous deadline of December 21, 2019.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Bennet J. Moskowitz | Attorney |
Counsel for Defendants (Troutman Sanders LLP), author of the letter.
|
| Paul A. Engelmayer | Judge |
Addressee of the letter, presiding over the case.
|
| Jane Doe 17 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in the lawsuit against the Epstein Estate.
|
| Darren K. Indyke | Defendant / Co-Executor |
Co-Executor of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein.
|
| Richard D. Kahn | Defendant / Co-Executor |
Co-Executor of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein.
|
| Jeffrey E. Epstein | Deceased |
Mentioned as the deceased whose estate is being sued.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Troutman Sanders LLP |
Law firm representing the Defendants.
|
|
| United States District Court, SDNY |
Implied by 'United States Courthouse' and case details.
|
|
| Nine East 71st Street, Corporation |
Defendant entity.
|
|
| Financial Trust Company, Inc. |
Defendant entity.
|
|
| NES, LLC |
Defendant entity.
|
|
| Laurel, Inc. |
Defendant entity.
|
|
| Maple, Inc. |
Defendant entity.
|
|
| LSJE, LLC |
Defendant entity.
|
|
| HBRK Associates, Inc. |
Defendant entity.
|
|
| Nautilus, Inc. |
Defendant entity.
|
|
| Cypress, Inc. |
Defendant entity.
|
|
| JEGE, Inc. |
Defendant entity.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address of the United States Courthouse.
|
|
|
Address of Troutman Sanders LLP.
|
"Defendants do not object to Plaintiff proceeding anonymously to prevent the disclosure of her identity to the general public."Source
"Defendants seek the opportunity to be heard so the relief granted on Plaintiff’s Motion ensures Plaintiff may protect her anonymity without jeopardizing Defendants’ fundamental right to fully and fairly defend against this action."Source
"Plaintiffs’ counsel does not consent to this request."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,031 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document