Jane Doe 17
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Legal representative |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Andrew S. Buzin
|
Client |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Alan Goldfarb
|
Client |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
David H. Brodie
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Litigation |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Katlyn Doe
|
Litigation parallel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
David H. Brodie
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura J. Starr
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura J. Starr
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
|
Litigation plaintiff vs defendant |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim perpetrator |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-30 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Motion to Proceed Anonymously | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-07-11 | N/A | Plaintiff Jane Doe 17 submitted her claim to the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program. | Epstein Victims’ Compensati... | View |
| 2020-03-06 | N/A | Court Order filed relieving Andrew S. Buzin as counsel for Jane Doe 17 | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-03-06 | N/A | Court Order issued relieving Andrew S. Buzin and Buzin Law, P.C. as counsel for Jane Doe 17. | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-01-13 | N/A | Deadline for plaintiff to file an amended complaint or opposition to motion to dismiss. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2019-12-12 | N/A | Filing of Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order regarding Plaintiff's anonymity | US District Court SDNY | View |
| 2019-11-14 | N/A | Case referred to Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial purposes. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-11-08 | N/A | Filing of Motion to Proceed Anonymously on Behalf of Jane Doe 17 | US District Court SDNY | View |
| 2019-11-08 | N/A | Court Order (ECF #25) granting Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed Anonymously. | New York, NY | View |
| 2019-11-08 | N/A | Plaintiff filed Motion to Proceed Anonymously (ECF #24). | New York, NY | View |
| 2019-11-08 | N/A | Proposed order filed granting Plaintiff Jane Doe 17's motion to proceed anonymously. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2019-10-22 | N/A | Summons issued and filed. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-10-18 | N/A | Filing of Document 5 (Civil Cover Sheet) in Case 1:19-cv-09610-PAE-DCF. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2019-10-17 | N/A | Filing of Civil Cover Sheet for Case 1:19-cv-09610-PAE-DCF | SDNY (Manhattan) | View |
| 2010-12-06 | N/A | Court Order Granted | Fort Lauderdale, Florida | View |
015.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York, dated September 4, 2020, by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman. The order applies to multiple civil cases filed against 'Indyke et al.' (executors of the Epstein estate) and 'Nine East 71st Street et al.' The proceedings are stayed to allow plaintiffs to pursue settlements through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, with status reports required starting October 1, 2020.
038.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York, dated September 4, 2020, by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman. The order applies to multiple civil cases against Indyke et al. and Nine East 71st Street et al., staying proceedings to allow plaintiffs to pursue settlements through the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program. Parties are ordered to submit status reports starting October 1, 2020.
048.pdf
This document is a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice for Case No. 1:19-cv-09610-PAE-DCF in the Southern District of New York, filed on October 8, 2020. Plaintiff Jane Doe 17 voluntarily dismisses her action against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and various associated corporate entities without costs. The document is signed by attorneys David H. Brodie (for the Plaintiff) and Bennet J. Moskowitz (for the Defendants).
045.pdf
A status report filed on August 14, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz representing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated corporate entities. The document informs Judge Debra C. Freeman that Plaintiff Jane Doe 17 submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program on July 11, 2020. The parties request that the current lawsuit remain stayed pending the resolution of the compensation claim.
044.pdf
A Notice of Change of Address filed on July 9, 2020, in the Southern District of New York case Jane Doe 17 v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn. Attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz notifies the court that his firm, Troutman Sanders LLP, has changed its name to Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, though the physical address and contact numbers remain the same.
042.pdf
This document is a Court Order from the United States District Court Southern District of New York, dated March 6, 2020, in Case No. 1:19-cv-09610-PAE. The order, signed by Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman, officially relieves Andrew S. Buzin and Buzin Law, P.C. as counsel for the plaintiff, Jane Doe 17, in her lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein and various associated corporations.
041.pdf
A letter motion filed on March 6, 2020, by Andrew S. Buzin of Buzin Law P.C. requesting permission to withdraw as local counsel for plaintiff Jane Doe 17 in her case against Indyke and Kahn (executors of the Epstein estate). The client requested the discharge, and she remains represented by attorneys from Weisman, Brodie, Starr & Margolies, P.A. and Alan Goldfarb, P.A. The letter notes that the case is currently stayed pending the plaintiff's potential participation in the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program.
041-01.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York dated March 6, 2020, in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. Judge Debra C. Freeman orders that attorney Andrew S. Buzin and his firm are relieved and discharged from representing the plaintiff, Jane Doe 17. The document lists numerous corporate defendants associated with Epstein's estate.
037.pdf
Court order from the Southern District of New York dated December 30, 2019, in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. Darren K. Indyke, et al. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer sets deadlines for the plaintiff to file an amended complaint (by Jan 13, 2020) and for subsequent responses from the defendants. The order establishes a procedural schedule following the defendants' motion to dismiss filed on December 23, 2019.
036.pdf
This document is a legal declaration filed on December 23, 2019, by Bennet J. Moskowitz, an attorney for the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. The declaration serves to submit a copy of the Plaintiff's (Jane Doe 17) original complaint as an exhibit in support of the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the case in the Southern District of New York.
036-01.pdf
This document is a civil complaint filed by a plaintiff identified as Jane Doe 17 against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and various corporate entities associated with him. The plaintiff alleges that she was a victim of a sex trafficking enterprise led by Epstein and facilitated by the defendant corporations, seeking damages under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (18 U.S.C. § 1595) and for common law battery. The document details the alleged scheme, the role of the corporate defendants in enabling the abuse, and includes an asset summary of Epstein's estate as an exhibit.
034.pdf
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on December 23, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The defendants, representing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and various associated corporations, are moving to dismiss the complaint of Plaintiff Jane Doe 17 with prejudice for failure to state a claim. The hearing is scheduled before Judge Paul E. Engelmayer.
033.pdf
A letter motion dated December 19, 2019, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz representing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated corporate entities, requesting a brief extension to respond to the complaint in Jane Doe 17 v. Indyke et al. The letter lists numerous corporate defendants linked to Epstein, including Nine East 71st Street Corp and Financial Trust Company. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer granted the request on the same day and noted that future requests should be directed to Judge Freeman.
031.pdf
This document is a Rule 7.1 Statement filed on December 19, 2019, in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and various associated corporate entities. The filing, submitted by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP, certifies that none of the defendant corporations have parent corporations or are owned 10% or more by publicly held corporations. It lists numerous entities associated with Epstein, including Nine East 71st Street Corporation, Financial Trust Company, and various LLCs.
029.pdf
This document is a Joint Stipulation filed on December 12, 2019, in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The parties agree to an order protecting the Plaintiff's anonymity, outlining strict protocols for disclosing her identity only to necessary defense counsel and staff, requiring Non-Disclosure Agreements for any other necessary disclosures. It includes the text of the proposed order and a template NDA.
027.pdf
A letter from defense attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The defense requests the court vacate a recent order granting the plaintiff anonymity, not to oppose the anonymity itself, but to ensure they have the opportunity to respond regarding the specific terms of that anonymity to protect their defense rights, citing a previous deadline of December 21, 2019.
026.pdf
This document is an Order of Reference to a Magistrate Judge filed on November 14, 2019, in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. Darren K. Indyke, et al. (Case 1:19-cv-09610). Judge Paul A. Engelmayer ordered the case to be referred for General Pretrial, which includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement.
025.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York dated November 8, 2019, signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. The order grants the motion of Plaintiff 'Jane Doe 17' to proceed anonymously in her case against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) and various associated corporate entities.
024.pdf
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on November 8, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-09610-PAE). The plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe 17, is suing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and various associated corporate entities (including Nine East 71st Street Corp and Financial Trust Company). The motion requests a court order allowing the plaintiff to proceed anonymously and lists the legal representation for the plaintiff from three different law firms.
024-02.pdf
A proposed court order from November 2019 in the Southern District of New York regarding case 1:19-cv-09610-PAE. The document grants Plaintiff Jane Doe 17's motion to proceed anonymously in a lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (represented by Indyke and Kahn) and numerous associated corporate entities.
024-01.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on November 8, 2019, in the Southern District of New York, requesting that Plaintiff 'Jane Doe 17' be allowed to proceed anonymously in her lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. The motion argues that the sensitive nature of the sexual assault allegations, the risk of retaliation due to Epstein's wealth and connections, and the lack of public interest in her specific identity outweigh the presumption of open proceedings. Attached as Exhibit A is a September 11, 2019 Order from Judge P. Kevin Castel in a similar case (Katlyn Doe v. Indyke), which granted anonymity under nearly identical circumstances.
023.pdf
A Notice of Appearance filed on November 7, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for Case No. 1:19-cv-09610-PAE (Jane Doe 17 v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein et al.). Attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP formally enters the case to represent the defendants, specifically the estate executors Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, as well as numerous corporate entities associated with Epstein (e.g., Nine East 71st Street Corp, Financial Trust Company, JEGE Inc.).
022.pdf
This document is an Appearance of Counsel form filed on November 6, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:19-cv-09610-PAE). Attorney Alan Goldfarb of Miami, Florida, is entering his appearance to represent the Plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe 17, in a lawsuit against Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (executors of the Epstein Estate).
021.pdf
A legal filing from Troutman Sanders LLP on behalf of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated corporate entities in the case Jane Doe 17 v. Indyke et al. The letter informs Judge Engelmayer of an agreement between parties regarding the acceptance of service and an extension of time until December 21, 2019, for the defendants to respond to the complaint. The judge granted and signed the order on November 5, 2019.
019.pdf
This document is an Appearance of Counsel form filed on October 28, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-09610-PAE). Attorney David H. Brodie enters his appearance as counsel for 'All plaintiffs' (identified as Jane Doe 17 in the caption) in the lawsuit against Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn.
Discharge of Counsel
Client indicating desire to discharge firm as counsel.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity