EFTA00019575.pdf
79.9 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email exchange
File Size:
79.9 KB
Summary
This document contains an email exchange between Jeffrey Pop, an attorney, and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York, dated December 23-24, 2019. The correspondence concerns an ongoing SDNY investigation related to an unnamed individual's interactions with Jeffrey Epstein, with the AUSA stating that there is currently no reason to believe the individual has criminal exposure, while Pop indicates he will consult with an associate and advise on the timing of a future attorney proffer.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Pop | Sender/Recipient |
Attorney at Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, involved in an SDNY investigation related to Jeffrey Epstein.
|
| Magaly Jimenez | CC Recipient |
CC'd on an email regarding an SDNY investigation.
|
| [Redacted Name] | Assistant U.S. Attorney |
Sender of the initial email, working for the Southern District of New York, involved in an SDNY investigation.
|
| Ms. [Redacted Name] | Individual under discussion |
Client or individual whose potential criminal exposure related to Jeffrey Epstein is being discussed.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of investigation |
Individual whose interactions with Ms. [Redacted Name] are under scrutiny in an SDNY investigation.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| JEFFREY S. POP & ASSOCIATES |
Law Corporation, employer of Jeffrey Pop.
|
|
| Southern District of New York |
U.S. Attorney's Office involved in the investigation.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2019-12-23
Phone conversation between Jeffrey Pop and an Assistant U.S. Attorney regarding an SDNY investigation concerning Ms. [Redacted Name]'s interactions with Jeffrey Epstein.
Not specified (phone call)
Jeffrey Pop
[Redacted Name] (Assistant U.S. Attorney)
Undated (future)
Attorney proffer regarding the outlined issues related to Ms. [Redacted Name] and Jeffrey Epstein.
Not specified
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Business address for Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates.
|
Relationships (3)
Jeffrey Pop
→
professional correspondence/legal consultation
→
[Redacted Name] (Assistant U.S. Attorney)
Email exchange regarding legal investigation.
Email discusses 'her interactions with Jeffrey Epstein' and 'her relationship with Mr. Epstein'.
Jeffrey Pop is discussing her potential criminal exposure and attorney proffer.
Key Quotes (2)
"Following up on our phone conversation today, I wanted to memorialize that, as discussed, we do not currently have reason to believe Ms. [Redacted Name] has criminal exposure based on what we are aware of in connection with her interactions with Jeffrey Epstein, and your brief attorney proffer regarding the circumstances of those interactions are consistent with that view."Source
EFTA00019575.pdf
Quote #1
"I will run it by an associate for a second opinion. If I then have questions I will circle back. Otherwise I will let you know about the timing of the attorney proffer regarding the issues you have outlined."Source
EFTA00019575.pdf
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,730 characters)
From: Jeffrey Pop <
To:
Cc: Magaly Jimenez <
Subject: RE: SDNY investigation.
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 16:44:18 +0000
Inline-Images: image001.jpg
To:
Cc: Magaly Jimenez <
Subject: RE: SDNY investigation.
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 16:44:18 +0000
Inline-Images: image001.jpg
I received the e-mail. I will run it by an associate for a second opinion. If I then have questions I will circle back.
Otherwise I will let you know about the timing of the attorney proffer regarding the issues you have outlined.
Jeff
Jeffrey S. Pop, Esq.
JEFFREY S. POP & ASSOCIATES
JEFFREY S. POP & ASSOCIATES
Beverly Hills, California 90212-3429
fax
www.poplawyer.com
www.vaccineinjuryteam.com
www.poplawyer.com
www.vaccineinjuryteam.com
JEFFREY S. POP & ASSOCIATES
A LAW CORPORATION
Since 1980
A LAW CORPORATION
Since 1980
CONFIDENTIALITY
This e-mail is for the personal and exclusive use of the recipient(s) named above. It contains confidential information from Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates. Its contents are not only to
remain absolutely confidential, but may also be subject to the attorney-client privilege or coverage under the work-product doctrine. If you have received this transmission and
are not the intended recipient, please immediately contact the sender by e-mail or telephone and delete the original message and all copies. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
transmission is strictly unauthorized and prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender at the number above, return the original e-mail by
mail, and delete the e-mail file from your computer. Postage is guaranteed. Your cooperation is appreciated. Thank you.
This e-mail is for the personal and exclusive use of the recipient(s) named above. It contains confidential information from Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates. Its contents are not only to
remain absolutely confidential, but may also be subject to the attorney-client privilege or coverage under the work-product doctrine. If you have received this transmission and
are not the intended recipient, please immediately contact the sender by e-mail or telephone and delete the original message and all copies. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
transmission is strictly unauthorized and prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender at the number above, return the original e-mail by
mail, and delete the e-mail file from your computer. Postage is guaranteed. Your cooperation is appreciated. Thank you.
From:
] (mailto:
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 9:34 PM
To: Jeffrey Pop
Cc:
Subject: RE: SDNY investigation,
] (mailto:
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 9:34 PM
To: Jeffrey Pop
Cc:
Subject: RE: SDNY investigation,
Jeff,
Following up on our phone conversation today, I wanted to memorialize that, as discussed, we do not currently have
reason to believe Ms. has criminal exposure based on what we are aware of in connection with her interactions
with Jeffrey Epstein, and your brief attorney proffer regarding the circumstances of those interactions are consistent with
that view. In your further discussions with Ms. in advance of a further attorney proffer to address the general
nature of her relationship with Mr. Epstein, as well as his employees or relevant close associates, if you have any concerns
about additional possible exposure you should please feel free to be in touch with us again. As we also discussed, I
believe any non-federal offenses would be well outside the relevant statute(s) of limitation, but of course if you wish to
further research that issue, or consult with criminal counsel, we defer to you entirely.
reason to believe Ms. has criminal exposure based on what we are aware of in connection with her interactions
with Jeffrey Epstein, and your brief attorney proffer regarding the circumstances of those interactions are consistent with
that view. In your further discussions with Ms. in advance of a further attorney proffer to address the general
nature of her relationship with Mr. Epstein, as well as his employees or relevant close associates, if you have any concerns
about additional possible exposure you should please feel free to be in touch with us again. As we also discussed, I
believe any non-federal offenses would be well outside the relevant statute(s) of limitation, but of course if you wish to
further research that issue, or consult with criminal counsel, we defer to you entirely.
Please let us know if any other information would be useful at this stage, and hopefully we can be in touch in the coming
weeks about productive next steps.
weeks about productive next steps.
thank you,
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Southern District of New York
Southern District of New York
EFTA00019575
EFTA00019576
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document