Jeffrey Pop
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
[Redacted Name] (Assistant U.S. Attorney)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. [Redacted Name]
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. [Redacted]
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Attorney proffer regarding the outlined issues related to Ms. [Redacted Name] and Jeffrey Epstein. | Not specified | View |
| 2020-01-20 | N/A | Proposed deadline for interview with client (Jeffrey Pop requested dates before this time). | Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates... | View |
| 2019-12-23 | N/A | Phone conversation between Jeffrey Pop and an Assistant U.S. Attorney regarding an SDNY investiga... | Not specified (phone call) | View |
| 2019-12-23 | N/A | Phone conversation between Jeffrey Pop and AUSA regarding client's status. | N/A | View |
EFTA00030695.pdf
This document is an email chain between attorney Jeffrey Pop and an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York regarding the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. Pop submits an Attorney Proffer detailing his client's interactions with Epstein, asserting she is a victim who was introduced to Epstein in New York (not involving minors) and suffers to this day. The SDNY prosecutor confirms that, based on current information, they do not believe the client has criminal exposure and discusses potential statutes of limitation.
EFTA00019575.pdf
This document contains an email exchange between Jeffrey Pop, an attorney, and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York, dated December 23-24, 2019. The correspondence concerns an ongoing SDNY investigation related to an unnamed individual's interactions with Jeffrey Epstein, with the AUSA stating that there is currently no reason to believe the individual has criminal exposure, while Pop indicates he will consult with an associate and advise on the timing of a future attorney proffer.
RE: SDNY investigation, [Redacted]
Acknowledging receipt of Attorney Proffer; confirming view that client does not have criminal exposure.
RE: SDNY investigation, [Redacted]
Submitting Attorney Proffer regarding client's involvement; stating client is a victim; proposing interview dates.
RE: SDNY investigation.
Acknowledges receipt of the email and states he will run it by an associate for a second opinion. Will circle back with questions if any arise, otherwise will inform about the timing of the attorney proffer.
RE: SDNY investigation, [Redacted]
Memorializing phone conversation; stating no current reason to believe client has criminal exposure; discussing statutes of limitation.
RE: SDNY investigation.
Follow-up on phone conversation, stating that based on current information, Ms. [Redacted Name] does not appear to have criminal exposure related to Jeffrey Epstein interactions. Encourages further contact if concerns about additional exposure arise. Mentions non-federal offenses and statute(s) of limitation. Asks for further useful information and productive next steps. Signed by Assistant U.S. Attorney, Southern District of New York.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity