HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017662.jpg

1.98 MB

Extraction Summary

2
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Law review article / legal proposal (evidence document)
File Size: 1.98 MB
Summary

This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (likely authored by Paul Cassell) discussing proposed amendments to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 12.3 and 15. The text argues for protecting victims' rights, specifically regarding witness disclosure in public-authority defenses and allowing victims to attend pre-trial depositions. The document was produced by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee as part of their investigation, marked with Bates number HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017662.

People (2)

Name Role Context
David Schoen Document Producer/Attorney
Name appears in the footer, indicating he is the source of this document production to the House Oversight Committee.
Cassell Author/Legal Scholar
Cited in footnotes 213 and 215 ('Cassell, Proposed Amendments'). The text uses first-person 'I', indicating Cassell i...

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Utah Law Review
Publisher of the document (2007 Utah L. Rev. 861).
Advisory Committee
Legal body responsible for reviewing and amending federal rules cited in the text.
House Oversight Committee
Recipient of the document (indicated by Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT).
Supreme Court
Implied by citation of Wardius v. Oregon, 412 U.S. 470.

Locations (2)

Location Context
Location associated with the Law Review.
Cited in case law (Wardius v. Oregon).

Relationships (1)

Cassell Professional/Advisory Advisory Committee
Cassell notes that the Advisory Committee appears to have overlooked his previous recommendations but later proposed an amendment in response to his argument.

Key Quotes (3)

"protecting victims from serious harm is certainly a strong state interest that would justify any incidental effect on defense preparations for trial."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017662.jpg
Quote #1
"I proposed amending Rule 15 to allow victims to attend any public depositions as follows"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017662.jpg
Quote #2
"Victims can attend any public deposition taken under this rule under the same conditions as govern a victim's attendance at trial."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017662.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,392 characters)

Page 27 of 78
2007 Utah L. Rev. 861, *898
way street." 212 In any event, protecting victims from serious harm is certainly a strong state interest that would justify any incidental effect on defense preparations for trial.
Finally, however one ends up on the proper formulation of the address issue under Rule 12.1 (governing alibi defenses), the same formulation ought to be used in Rule 12.3 (governing public-authority defenses). Although I made this recommendation in a previous article, 213 the Advisory Committee appears to have overlooked this parallel provision in need of amendment. So that it is not overlooked again, I will set out the proposal in full. Tracking my recommendations for Rule 12.1, I recommended a parallel amendment to Rule 12.3 as follows:
[*899]
Rule 12.3 Notice of a Public-Authority Defense
. . . .
(4) Disclosing Witnesses.
(A) Government's Request. An attorney for the government may request in writing that the defendant disclose the name, address, and telephone number of each witness and the address and telephone number of each witness (other than the victim) the defendant intends to rely on to establish a public-authority defense. An attorney for the government may serve the request when the government serves its response to the defendant's notice under Rule 12.3(a)(3), or later, but must serve the request no later than 20 days before trial.
(B) Defendant's Response. Within 7 days after receiving the government's request, the defendant must serve on an attorney for the government a written statement of the name, address and telephone number of each witness. and the address and telephone number of each witness (other than the victim).
(C) Government's Reply. Within 7 days after receiving the defendant's statement, an attorney for the government must serve on the defendant or the defendant's attorney a written statement of the name, address, and telephone number of each witness, and the address and telephone number of each witness (other than the victim), the government intends to rely on to oppose the defendant's public-authority defense.
(b) Continuing Duty to Disclose. Both an attorney for the government and the defendant must promptly disclose in writing to the other party the name, address, and telephone number of any additional witness and the address and telephone number of each witness (other than the victim) if:
(1) the disclosing party learns of the witness before or during trial; and
(2) the witness should have been disclosed under Rule 12.3(a)(4) if the disclosing party had known of the witness earlier. 214
[*900] Rule 15 - Victims' Right to Attend Pre-Trial Depositions The Proposals:
I proposed amending Rule 15 to allow victims to attend any public depositions as follows:
(i) Victims Can Attend. Victims can attend any public deposition taken under this rule under the same conditions as govern a victim's attendance at trial. 215
________________________________________________________________
212 Wardius v. Oregon, 412 U.S. 470, 475 (1973).
213 Cassell, Proposed Amendments, supra note 4, at 873.
214 Apparently in response to my argument, the Advisory Committee has just proposed an amendment to Rule 12.3 paralleling its amendment to Rule 12.1. See infra notes 585-587 and accompanying text.
215 Cassell, Proposed Amendments, supra note 4, at 874.
DAVID SCHOEN
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017662

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document