DOJ-OGR-00009926.jpg

1.01 MB

Extraction Summary

6
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
4
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 1.01 MB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Conrad. The questioning focuses on her financial situation, including her assets of approximately $14,000, her past earnings as a lawyer, and her tax filing history. The attorney attempts to scrutinize her financial success and challenges the truthfulness of a prior affidavit she submitted to a disciplinary committee, while Ms. Conrad is often evasive in her answers.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Conrad Witness
The individual being questioned under direct examination, referred to as Ms. Conrad.
Judge Pauley Judge
Mentioned as having previously asked Ms. Conrad about her finances regarding the appointment of a lawyer.
Mr. Daugerdas Client
Referred to as 'your client' by Ms. Conrad to the questioning attorney, in relation to a guilty verdict she rendered.
Mr. Okula Attorney
Makes objections on behalf of the witness, Ms. Conrad.
THE COURT Presiding Judge
Rules on objections and directs the witness to answer questions.
Mr. Gair Attorney
Apologizes to the court after an objection is sustained.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA government agency
Named as the plaintiff in the case heading 'UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,'.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS company
Listed at the bottom of the document, indicating the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.
The Bar professional association
Mentioned in the context of a sworn affidavit Ms. Conrad provided.
Disciplinary committee committee
Mentioned in relation to an affidavit filed by Ms. Conrad on February 28, 2011.

Timeline (4 events)

2007
Ms. Conrad states she was a 'suspended lawyer' in 2007.
Ms. Conrad
2008 or 2009
Ms. Conrad states the last time she filed a tax return was in 2008 or 2009.
Ms. Conrad
2011-02-28
Ms. Conrad filed a sworn affidavit with a disciplinary committee.
Ms. Conrad
2012-02-15
Direct examination of witness Ms. Conrad.
Courtroom
Ms. Conrad Mr. Okula Mr. Gair The Court Unnamed questioning attorney

Relationships (2)

Unnamed questioning attorney professional Mr. Daugerdas
Ms. Conrad refers to Mr. Daugerdas as 'your client' when speaking to the attorney.
Mr. Okula professional Ms. Conrad
Mr. Okula makes objections on behalf of Ms. Conrad during her testimony, suggesting he is her legal counsel.

Key Quotes (3)

"I'm not discussing my finances in open court, sir."
Source
— Ms. Conrad (Response to a question about her cash resources.)
DOJ-OGR-00009926.jpg
Quote #1
"I'm directing you to answer questions that are put before you."
Source
— THE COURT (An order from the judge to Ms. Conrad after she refused to discuss her finances.)
DOJ-OGR-00009926.jpg
Quote #2
"Ask my mother. I have no idea. I don't know what that means."
Source
— Ms. Conrad (Response to a question about whether she has achieved financial success as a lawyer.)
DOJ-OGR-00009926.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,811 characters)

Case 6:10-cr-00888-WHP Document 646-10 Filed 08/22/12 Page 525 of 767
A-5643
February 15, 2012
C2FFDAU4 Conrad - direct Page 133
1 Q. So my question is, did you understand at that moment that
2 there was a logical connection between the question Judge
3 Pauley was asking you about your finances and the matter he was
4 discussing with you, that is, appointment of a lawyer?
5 A. Yes, sir.
6 Q. You did understand?
7 A. Yes, sir.
8 Q. And yet you refused to answer those questions, correct?
9 A. At that time.
10 Q. And in fact, you said your personal finances have nothing
11 to do with this, correct?
12 A. And had nothing to do with the guilty verdict I rendered
13 against your client.
14 Q. But it did have something to do with what you were being
15 asked about, that is, your right to a lawyer, correct?
16 A. I guess if that's what it says.
17 Q. Now, it turns out that you do have some cash resources?
18 A. I'm not discussing my finances in open court, sir.
19 THE COURT: I'm directing you to answer questions that
20 are put before you.
21 Q. Ms. Conrad, isn't it true that you have cash on hand or
22 money in savings or checking accounts of approximately $12,000?
23 A. If that's the affidavit of financial statement you received
24 from my attorney this morning, then that is correct.
25 Q. Well, I'm not -- I didn't make any reference to an
C2FFDAU4 Conrad - direct Page 134
1 affidavit --
2 A. I didn't have to, sir. How else would you know that?
3 Q. Ms. Conrad, my question for you is a simple one. Do you
4 have $12,000 cash on hand?
5 A. Approximately. That has nothing to do with the guilty
6 verdict I rendered against Mr. Daugerdas, your client.
7 Q. And do you also have about $2,000 in stocks and bonds?
8 A. You can read my affidavit very correctly, yes. That you
9 received this morning.
10 Q. Is the answer to my question, yes, you do have $2,000?
11 A. I don't know the exact amount. Approximately.
12 Q. So all together you have about $14,000 in either cash or
13 stocks and bonds, is that correct?
14 A. Correct. Much less than your client.
15 Q. You haven't been a very successful person, have you,
16 Ms. Conrad?
17 MR. OKULA: Objection, your Honor.
18 A. I don't know what that means. Ask my mother.
19 THE COURT: Sustained as to form.
20 Q. Have you been a successful -- have you achieved financial
21 success as a lawyer?
22 A. Ask my mother. I have no idea. I don't know what that
23 means.
24 Q. I have to ask your mother whether or not you have achieved
25 financial success as a lawyer?
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,
Page 135
C2FFDAU4 Conrad - direct
1 A. She's the only person that I care about whose opinion
2 matters to me.
3 Q. Do you know whether you are a financial success as a
4 lawyer?
5 A. No, I have no idea. It's a sliding scale.
6 Q. How much money did you make as a lawyer the last year you
7 were practicing law?
8 A. Could I make? I have no idea.
9 MR. OKULA: Judge, relevance.
10 THE COURT: Overruled.
11 Q. How much did you make practicing as a lawyer in 2007?
12 A. I wasn't a practicing lawyer.
13 Q. What were you doing in 2007?
14 A. Being a suspended lawyer.
15 Q. How much money did you make in 2006 as a lawyer?
16 A. I don't recall.
17 Q. Was it over $400?
18 A. An hour?
19 Q. No, $400 total in the year.
20 A. Probably, sir.
21 Q. Probably. And were you self-employed?
22 A. Yes, at that time.
23 Q. When was the last time you filed a tax return, Ms. Conrad?
24 A. 2008 or 2009.
25 Q. 2008 or 2009. Didn't you tell the Bar in a sworn affidavit
C2FFDAU4 Conrad - direct Page 136
1 on February 28th of 2011 that you hadn't been -- the question
2 attach your last two years federal and state tax returns the
3 answer was none, not applicable.
4 A. Absolutely, because that was the truth.
5 Q. So you filed a tax return in 2009?
6 A. I filed the document about which you are speaking on
7 February 28, 2011.
8 Q. When was the last time you filed a tax return?
9 A. Either 2008 or 2009. I'm not sure.
10 Q. Well, if it was filed in 2009, then your answer to the
11 disciplinary committee question would have been untruthful,
12 correct?
13 A. If you want to parse semantics.
14 Q. Well, that's kind of what we do in court, Ms. Conrad.
15 MR. OKULA: Objection, your Honor.
16 THE COURT: Sustained.
17 MR. GAIR: Sorry, your Honor. My apologies.
18 Q. Ms. Conrad, do you know whether you gave a truthful answer
19 to that question on the disciplinary committee affidavit you
20 filed on February 28th of 2011?
21 A. I believe I did.
22 Q. Now, can you give us an idea, just to go back to finish off
23 this issue, would you characterize yourself by your own
24 standards as a financially successful lawyer?
25 A. I don't know what your question means.
Page 133 - Page 136 (34) SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS
DOJ-OGR-00009926

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document