This document is a page from a legal filing authored by David Schoen (likely representing victims in the Epstein case), produced to the House Oversight Committee. It presents a legal argument contrasting the Victims' Rights and Restitution Act (VRRA) with the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), arguing that the Justice Department is obligated to recognize and inform victims as soon as an investigation opens, not just after formal charges are filed. It criticizes a 2011 Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) memorandum that attempted to limit these protections for victims of uncharged conduct.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| David Schoen | Attorney/Author |
Name appears at the footer of the document, indicating he is likely the author of this legal submission.
|
| Attorney General | Government Official |
Referenced regarding the promulgation of internal guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance.
|
| Turner | Litigant |
Party in cited case United States v. Turner.
|
| Searcy | Litigant |
Party in cited cases Searcy v. Paletz and Searcy v. Skinner.
|
| Paletz | Litigant |
Party in cited case Searcy v. Paletz.
|
| Skinner | Litigant |
Party in cited case Searcy v. Skinner.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Department |
Department of Justice (DOJ); discussed regarding obligations to victims under VRRA and CVRA.
|
|
| Congress |
Mentioned regarding legislative intent of the CVRA.
|
|
| OLC |
Office of Legal Counsel; referenced regarding a 2011 memorandum limiting victim protections.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Eastern District of New York; cited in footnote 102 regarding case law.
|
"Indeed, it would be absurd to think that Congress wanted to permit the Justice Department to treat crime victims unfairly until criminal charges have been filed."Source
"The VRRA defines 'victim' as a 'person that has suffered direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary harm as a result of the commission of a crime.'"Source
"Instead of recognizing Congress's intent, OLC's 2011 memorandum simply cites to a series of cases in which courts concluded that a victim of uncharged conduct should not be afforded statutory protections."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (4,032 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document