DOJ-OGR-00001926.jpg
651 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
5
Organizations
2
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
651 KB
Summary
This legal document discusses cases involving Khashoggi, Bodmer, Hanson, and Sabhnani. It mentions a defendant who is a citizen of England and France and has three passports, and the document discusses the defendant's international travel and financial means.
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. | Government |
U.S. v. Khashoggi, U.S. v. Bodmer
|
| Sabhnani | Company |
Sabhnani itself, Sabhnani, a Second Circuit case
|
| Second Circuit | Court |
Second Circuit case
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Company name at the end of the document
|
| government | Government Agency |
the government on that, according to the government
|
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,528 characters)
that are relevant to that, which I was going to get to, your
Honor, are Khashoggi, U.S. v. Khashoggi, U.S. v. Bodmer, U.S.
v. Hanson, and Sabhnani itself, all of which involve defendants
with substantial connections.
And I might follow up on your Honor's question, when
you take off the spin and you take off the media and I'm
going to get to it in a moment, because your Honor is going to
allow me to respond -- here is their case: Defendant is a
citizen of more than one country, England and France, not
exactly exotic places. The defendant has three passports. The
defendant has traveled internationally in the past, not in the
past year. There is no refutation from the government on that,
and they have been all over her travel records. The defendant
has resided here in the past year. She has traveled
internationally and, according to the government, she has
financial means. I will get to that in a moment, Judge. But
let's assume for the purposes of this discussion that she has
financial means and not the lies that the government laid out.
What do those cases teach? They teach that that is something
the court can and should address in the bail conditions. They
teach that they may require stricter bail conditions. They
don't teach that that means there should be no bail at all. In
Sabhnani, a Second Circuit case, the allegation was that the
defendants have held two individuals in slavery for five years,
and they had many more international ties or international
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
Honor, are Khashoggi, U.S. v. Khashoggi, U.S. v. Bodmer, U.S.
v. Hanson, and Sabhnani itself, all of which involve defendants
with substantial connections.
And I might follow up on your Honor's question, when
you take off the spin and you take off the media and I'm
going to get to it in a moment, because your Honor is going to
allow me to respond -- here is their case: Defendant is a
citizen of more than one country, England and France, not
exactly exotic places. The defendant has three passports. The
defendant has traveled internationally in the past, not in the
past year. There is no refutation from the government on that,
and they have been all over her travel records. The defendant
has resided here in the past year. She has traveled
internationally and, according to the government, she has
financial means. I will get to that in a moment, Judge. But
let's assume for the purposes of this discussion that she has
financial means and not the lies that the government laid out.
What do those cases teach? They teach that that is something
the court can and should address in the bail conditions. They
teach that they may require stricter bail conditions. They
don't teach that that means there should be no bail at all. In
Sabhnani, a Second Circuit case, the allegation was that the
defendants have held two individuals in slavery for five years,
and they had many more international ties or international
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document