HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021755.jpg

2.72 MB

Extraction Summary

8
People
5
Organizations
4
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Investigative report / article clip (house oversight document)
File Size: 2.72 MB
Summary

This document, stemming from a House Oversight collection, appears to be an excerpt from a report or article comparing the U.S. Attorney's Office's strict handling of a defendant named McDaniel with their lenient handling of Jeffrey Epstein. It details how prosecutors Acosta and Villafaña negotiated a non-prosecution agreement with Epstein's lawyers (including Jay Lefkowitz) in 2007, suppressing a 53-page federal indictment and keeping victims uninformed to ensure the deal's success. The text highlights the 'Perversion of Justice' investigation which exposed these actions.

People (8)

Name Role Context
McDaniel Defendant (Comparison Case)
A defendant in a separate case used to contrast prosecutorial behavior; had a prior relationship with a 16-year-old.
Andrew Lourie Assistant U.S. Attorney
Assigned to correct the record in the McDaniel case regarding sentencing comments.
Zloch Judge
Judge in the McDaniel case who criticized the U.S. Attorney's Office for lack of candor.
Hakes Commentator/Source
Quoted regarding the seriousness of 'lack of candor to the court'.
Villafaña Federal Prosecutor
Involved in negotiations with Epstein's lawyers; discussed quiet resolution and sentencing agreement wording.
Jeffrey Epstein Defendant
Subject of FBI investigation and plea deal negotiations.
Acosta Federal Prosecutor (U.S. Attorney)
Allowed Epstein to plead guilty to state charges instead of federal indictment; granted federal immunity to Epstein a...
Jay Lefkowitz Epstein's Lawyer
Correspondent with Villafaña regarding sentencing agreement wording.

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
U.S. Attorney's Office
Prosecuting body in both McDaniel and Epstein cases.
Probation Department
Received information regarding McDaniel.
FBI
Conducting ongoing investigation into Epstein in 2007.
Miami Herald
Published the 'Perversion of Justice' investigation.
House Oversight Committee
Source of the document (indicated by footer).

Timeline (3 events)

November (Year implied as 2018 based on context)
Publication of 'Perversion of Justice' by Miami Herald.
Miami
Pre-2008 Plea Deal
Drafting of 53-page federal indictment on sex trafficking charges (never filed).
Federal Court
Prosecutors
September 2007
Villafaña negotiations with Epstein's lawyers.
Unknown
Villafaña Epstein's lawyers

Locations (4)

Location Context
Location where McDaniel's relationship was cited as not illegal.
Location where McDaniel's relationship was cited as not illegal.
Proposed location for charging Epstein to minimize media coverage.
Location where Epstein's crimes occurred.

Relationships (2)

Villafaña Legal Counterparts Jay Lefkowitz
Villafaña wrote Epstein’s lawyer, Jay Lefkowitz, to discuss the wording of the sentencing agreement
Acosta Prosecutor/Defendant (Plea Deal) Jeffrey Epstein
Acosta instead allowed Epstein to plead guilty to two prostitution charges... In exchange, Epstein and his co-conspirators were given federal immunity.

Key Quotes (3)

"Lack of candor to the court is a serious charge, and the judge has quite reasonably expressed dismay that the assistant U.S. attorney apparently intended that he never be given a full picture of the defendant’s conduct"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021755.jpg
Quote #1
"Perversion of Justice"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021755.jpg
Quote #2
"Prosecutors had drafted a 53-page federal indictment on sex trafficking charges, but Acosta instead allowed Epstein to plead guilty to two prostitution charges in state court."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021755.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,558 characters)

wrote, explaining that the defendant’s past was evidence of predatory behavior that warranted a harsher sentence because he may pose a danger to the community.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Lourie was assigned to try to correct the record and persuade the judge to strike a portion of his comments. They argued that since McDaniel had never before been charged with a crime, the history was not relevant at sentencing. The defendant’s prior relationship with a 16-year-old was not illegal in Texas or in California, they said, and the girl classified her relationship as a friendship.
All the relevant information was provided to the probation department and at McDaniel’s detention hearing, they added, making the point that it was in the record and therefore, not intentionally withheld by the government.
While Zloch conceded that the information was part of the probation and bond hearing record, he said it was nevertheless the U.S. Attorney’s Office’s duty to present the defendant’s prior history with minors at sentencing. He refused to strike the most critical portions of his order.
“Lack of candor to the court is a serious charge, and the judge has quite reasonably expressed dismay that the assistant U.S. attorney apparently intended that he never be given a full picture of the defendant’s conduct,” Hakes said.
But nine months later, in September 2007, Villafaña was in the throes of thorny negotiations with Epstein’s lawyers. While an FBI investigation was ongoing, Villafaña discussed ways to quietly resolve the case, emails show.
A Miami Herald investigation, “Perversion of Justice,” published in November, revealed how federal prosecutors, including Acosta and Villafaña, tried to keep the full scope of Epstein’s crimes out of the public eye. At one point, they discussed charging Epstein in Miami, instead of Palm Beach where the crimes happened, noting there would be less media coverage.
Emails also show that prosecutors repeatedly abided by Epstein’s lawyers’ demands that his victims not be told that an agreement had been reached until after he was sentenced. That meant that the girls could not appear at the hearing to derail the deal. Prosecutors had drafted a 53-page federal indictment on sex trafficking charges, but Acosta instead allowed Epstein to plead guilty to two prostitution charges in state court. In exchange, Epstein and his co-conspirators were given federal immunity.
Villafaña wrote Epstein’s lawyer, Jay Lefkowitz, to discuss the wording of the sentencing agreement for the judge:
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021755

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document