DOJ-OGR-00020540.jpg

1.4 MB

Extraction Summary

12
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court docket / case log
File Size: 1.4 MB
Summary

This document is a court docket log from late October to early November 2021 in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. It details procedural orders regarding legal mail at the MDC, scheduling for Rule 412 (sexual behavior evidence) and Daubert (expert witness) hearings, and disputes over redactions in court filings. It also records a minute entry for a pretrial conference attended by Maxwell and her defense team alongside government prosecutors, noting that Maxwell remains remanded.

People (12)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of court orders; present at Pretrial Conference; remains remanded.
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Presiding judge signing orders and holding conferences.
Bobbi Sternheim Defense Attorney
Representing Ghislaine Maxwell at Pretrial Conference.
Jeff Pagliuca Defense Attorney
Representing Ghislaine Maxwell at Pretrial Conference.
Christian Everdell Defense Attorney
Representing Ghislaine Maxwell at Pretrial Conference.
Laura Menninger Defense Attorney
Representing Ghislaine Maxwell at Pretrial Conference.
Lara Pomerantz AUSA (Government Attorney)
Representing USA at Pretrial Conference; signatory on letter re: legal mail.
Maurene Comey AUSA (Government Attorney)
Representing USA at Pretrial Conference.
Alison Moe AUSA (Government Attorney)
Representing USA at Pretrial Conference; signatory on letter re: legal mail.
Andrew Rohrbach AUSA (Government Attorney)
Representing USA at Pretrial Conference; signatory on letter re: legal mail.
Pamela Utter Court Reporter
Recording Pretrial Conference.
Michael McDaniel Court Reporter
Recording Pretrial Conference.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
MDC
Metropolitan Detention Center; location where Maxwell is held and receiving legal mail.
USA
The Government; filing letters and attending conferences.
Second Circuit
Cited for legal precedent (Lugosch v. Pyramid Co.).

Timeline (2 events)

11/05/2021, 11/09/2021, or 11/10/2021
Proposed dates for Rule 412 and Daubert hearings
Court
Judge Nathan Counsel Alleged Victims (optional)

Locations (1)

Location Context
MDC
Metropolitan Detention Center (Brooklyn), regarding legal mail issues.

Relationships (2)

Ghislaine Maxwell Attorney-Client Bobbi Sternheim
Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell present with attorney Bobbi Sternheim
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant-Judge Judge Alison J. Nathan
ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell... Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan

Key Quotes (4)

"Before admitting evidence under this rule, the court must conduct an in camera hearing and give the victim and parties a right to attend and be heard."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020540.jpg
Quote #1
"Defendant remains remanded."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020540.jpg
Quote #2
"The Court will also not permit redactions pertaining to the general description of evidence or anticipated testimony as such redactions are unnecessary to protect the privacy interests of the individuals implicated."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020540.jpg
Quote #3
"attached is the Court's draft preliminary remarks to be recorded and played before each voir dire session."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020540.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,994 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page54 of 92
10/29/2021 | 402 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of Defendant's letter regarding delivery of Defendant's legal mail at MDC. Dkt. No. 381. The Government is hereby ORDERED to respond by Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 12:00 p.m. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 10/29/2021)(bw) (Entered: 11/02/2021)
10/31/2021 | 400 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of the Defendant's motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412, Dkt. No. 378, and the Defendant's motion in limine to exclude under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), Dkt. No. 386. The issues raised in the two motions overlap significantly. The Court is required under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 to conduct an in camera hearing. Fed. R. Evid. 412 ("Before admitting evidence under this rule, the court must conduct an in camera hearing and give the victim and parties a right to attend and be heard. Unless the court orders otherwise, the motion, related materials, and the record of the hearing must remain under seal.). In addition, the Court has determined it will conduct a Daubert hearing with respect to the Defendant's motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 702. Because of the overlap in the substance of the motions, the Court will conduct the two proceedings back to back. The Court previously set a tentative date for the Rule 412 Motion hearing as November 5, 2021. Dkt. No. 354. The Court is prepared to proceed with both hearings on that date. Alternatively, the proceedings could be held on either the afternoon of November 9 or the afternoon of November 10. The Government shall confer with its proposed expert regarding availability for the Daubert hearing as well as with alleged victims who wish to attend and be heard at the Rule 412 Motion hearing. After doing so, the parties shall confer with each other as to availability. On or before November 2, 2021, the parties shall jointly file a letter with the Court indicating whether the parties request that the hearings be held on November 5, 9, or 10. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 10/31/2021)(bw) (Entered: 11/01/2021)
11/01/2021 | 401 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of the parties' proposed redactions to the parties' motions in limine, responses in opposition, replies in support, and related exhibits. As the Court indicated at today's conference, some of the parties' proposed redactions are overbroad considering the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). In particular, for the reasons stated at today's conference, the Court denies the Government's request to redact section ten of the Government's motion in limine. See Dkt. No. 380. The Court will also not permit redactions pertaining to the general description of evidence or anticipated testimony as such redactions are unnecessary to protect the privacy interests of the individuals implicated. Accordingly, the parties must propose more tailored redactions consistent with the Court's discussion at today's conference. The parties are ORDERED to submit the proposals to the Court via email by November 4, 2021. In order to facilitate the Court's review of the requests, the Court requires the parties to submit the proposed redactions as a single document and with the proposed redactions highlighted. The Defendant's proposed redactions should be highlighted in one color, and the Government's a different color. The Court will rule on the proposed redactions expeditiously. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/1/2021)(bw) (Entered: 11/02/2021)
11/01/2021 | | Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan: Pretrial Conference as to Ghislaine Maxwell held on 11/1/2021. Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell present with attorney Bobbi Sternheim, Jeff Pagliuca, Christian Everdell and Laura Menninger. AUSA Lara Pomerantz, Maurene Comey, Alison Moe and Andrew Rohrbach for the government. Court Reporters Pamela Utter and Michael McDaniel. Pretrial Conference held. Defendant remains remanded. See Transcript. (jbo) (Entered: 11/02/2021)
11/02/2021 | 403 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 2, 2021 re: Delivery of Legal Mail at MDC Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 11/02/2021)
11/02/2021 | 404 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. As discussed at yesterday's conference, attached is the Court's draft preliminary remarks to be recorded and played before each voir dire session. The parties may suggest any proposed edits or additions by letter on or before November 8, 2021, or they shall indicate by that date that they have no objections or suggestions. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/2/2021)(bw)
DOJ-OGR-00020540

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document