This document is page 19 of a rough draft deposition transcript. A witness explains a technical word processing error that caused a 'star footnote' to disappear from a legal filing (a joinder motion) near the University of Utah signature block. The questioner presses the witness on whether this error made it appear as though the University of Utah was endorsing the pleading, to which the witness begins to disagree.
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| University of Utah |
Mentioned in the context of a signature block on a legal document.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
"one of the problems with the Word processing program to drop a star footnote is it requires... different sections"Source
"put in a footnote where the University of Utah signature block is, for example, it becomes footnote 2"Source
"I realized that the star footnote had dropped off, so I filed a corrected pleading"Source
"You would agree with me that a fair-minded, a reasonable reader... could conclude that the University of Utah was somehow endorsing or standing behind this pleading?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,431 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document