This is the final page of a legal document (Document 528) filed on December 6, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. The United States Attorney, Damian Williams, and his assistants conclude their argument by requesting the Court to preclude testimony from "Jane's counsel." They argue that allowing such testimony would compel a witness named Glassman to provide extensive context beyond existing notes, thereby exceeding the scope of any privilege waiver.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Glassman |
Mentioned as a potential witness whose testimony would need to go beyond notes and could involve privilege waiver.
|
|
| Jane |
Mentioned in the context of "Jane's counsel," suggesting she is a party to the legal case.
|
|
| DAMIAN WILLIAMS | United States Attorney |
Listed as the United States Attorney submitting the document.
|
| Maurene Comey | Assistant United States Attorney |
Listed as one of the Assistant United States Attorneys on the filing.
|
| Alison Moe | Assistant United States Attorney |
Listed as one of the Assistant United States Attorneys on the filing.
|
| Lara Pomerantz | Assistant United States Attorney |
Listed as one of the Assistant United States Attorneys on the filing.
|
| Andrew Rohrbach | Assistant United States Attorney |
Listed as one of the Assistant United States Attorneys on the filing.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Attorney | government agency |
The office of DAMIAN WILLIAMS, representing the government in the case.
|
| Southern District of New York | government agency |
The jurisdiction for the Assistant United States Attorneys who filed the document.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location of the court and the jurisdiction of the U.S. Attorneys.
|
"For the foregoing reasons, the Court should preclude testimony by Jane’s counsel."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (746 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document