EFTA00020088.pdf
63.2 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
63.2 KB
Summary
This document is an email chain from June 2020 regarding a 'Touhy Request' for evidence in the civil case 'Jane Doe v. Indyke et al.' in the SDNY. Attorney Robert Glassman of Panish Shea & Boyle LLP submits the request, and internal recipients (likely government officials given the nature of a Touhy request) discuss fulfilling it, noting it is similar to a request from 'Kaplan' and does not interfere with ongoing proceedings, with the exception of 'Item 8'.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Robert Glassman | Attorney |
Sender of the original email request; Attorney at Panish Shea & Boyle LLP
|
| Nathan Werksman | Cc Recipient |
Copied on the email from Robert Glassman
|
| Keilah Betts | Cc Recipient |
Copied on the email from Robert Glassman
|
| Kaplan | Attorney (Mentioned) |
Mentioned in the internal email regarding a similar previous request (likely Roberta Kaplan)
|
| Jane Doe | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in the referenced case Jane Doe v. Indyke et al.
|
| Indyke | Defendant |
Defendant in the referenced case (Darren Indyke, executor of Epstein estate)
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Panish Shea & Boyle LLP |
Law firm representing the requester Robert Glassman
|
|
| SDNY |
Southern District of New York (Court where the case is filed)
|
|
| Fedex |
Delivery method for physical copy of the letter
|
Timeline (1 events)
2020-06-08
Relationships (2)
Copied on the same legal correspondence email
Copied on the same legal correspondence email
Key Quotes (2)
"Will you be able to gather the responsive documents for Glassman’s request, as with the request from Kaplan?"Source
EFTA00020088.pdf
Quote #1
"Except for Item 8, this request seems fairly contained—and they have expressly cabined their request to not seek documents that would interfere with ongoing proceedings."Source
EFTA00020088.pdf
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,152 characters)
From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: FW: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request); Jane Doe v. Indyke et al., SDNY Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 03:51:05 +0000
Importance: High
Attachments: 6_8_20_Ltr_re_Jane_Doe_Touhy_request.pdf
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: FW: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request); Jane Doe v. Indyke et al., SDNY Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 03:51:05 +0000
Importance: High
Attachments: 6_8_20_Ltr_re_Jane_Doe_Touhy_request.pdf
Hi all,
Will you be able to gather the responsive documents for Glassman’s request, as with the request from Kaplan? Except for Item 8, this request seems fairly contained—and they have expressly cabined their request to not seek documents that would interfere with ongoing proceedings. Please let me know if we need to discuss. Otherwise, I’ll draft a letter once we have the docs gathered (happy to do redactions again if helpful).
Thanks,
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
From: Robert Glassman <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 3:08 PM
To: [REDACTED]
Cc: [REDACTED]; Nathan Werksman <[REDACTED]>; Keilah Betts <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request); Jane Doe v. Indyke et al., SDNY Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF
Importance: High
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 3:08 PM
To: [REDACTED]
Cc: [REDACTED]; Nathan Werksman <[REDACTED]>; Keilah Betts <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Request for Tangible and Documentary Evidence (Touhy Request); Jane Doe v. Indyke et al., SDNY Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF
Importance: High
Dear Mr. [REDACTED],
Please see the attached letter of today’s date. A copy will also be sent via Fedex. Thank you.
Robert Glassman
Robert Glassman, Esq.
Panish Shea & Boyle LLP
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Email: [REDACTED]
Web: www.psblaw.com
Panish Shea & Boyle LLP
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Email: [REDACTED]
Web: www.psblaw.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail or telephone, and delete all copies of this message.
This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail or telephone, and delete all copies of this message.
If you are a potential client, the information you disclose to us by email will be kept in strict confidence and will be protected to the full extent of the law. Please be advised, however, that Panish Shea & Boyle LLP and its lawyers do not represent you until you have signed a retainer agreement with the firm. Until that time, you are responsible for any statutes of limitations or other deadlines for your case or potential case.
EFTA00020088
EFTA00020089
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document