This page describes a deposition where the witness discusses the credibility of attorney David Boies. The witness draws a parallel between Boies' high-profile work representing Al Gore in the 'Bush v. Gore' Supreme Court case and his decision to represent Virginia Roberts. The witness implies that Boies' involvement gave weight or significance to Roberts' case.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Simpson | Attorney/Interviewer |
Speaking in the deposition
|
| Ms. McCawley | Attorney |
Speaking in the deposition, acknowledges the witness's statement
|
| The Witness | Deponent |
Testifying regarding their knowledge of David Boies and Virginia Roberts
|
| Al Gore | Former Vice President/Presidential Candidate |
Mentioned in relation to the Bush v. Gore Supreme Court case
|
| David Boies | Attorney |
Described as the attorney who argued for Al Gore and subsequently agreed to represent Virginia Roberts
|
| Virginia Roberts | Plaintiff/Victim |
Mentioned as being represented by David Boies
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Supreme Court |
Venue for Bush v. Gore case
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the document ID 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021910'
|
"I knew that David Boies had agreed to represent Virginia Roberts which gave me"Source
"probably the most significant United States Supreme Court case argued in the last 20 years was Bush versus Gore"Source
"He [David Boies] had put his credibility on the line in arguing the Bush versus Gore case"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,139 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document