HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021910.jpg

1.32 MB

Extraction Summary

6
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal deposition transcript (rough draft)
File Size: 1.32 MB
Summary

This page describes a deposition where the witness discusses the credibility of attorney David Boies. The witness draws a parallel between Boies' high-profile work representing Al Gore in the 'Bush v. Gore' Supreme Court case and his decision to represent Virginia Roberts. The witness implies that Boies' involvement gave weight or significance to Roberts' case.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Mr. Simpson Attorney/Interviewer
Speaking in the deposition
Ms. McCawley Attorney
Speaking in the deposition, acknowledges the witness's statement
The Witness Deponent
Testifying regarding their knowledge of David Boies and Virginia Roberts
Al Gore Former Vice President/Presidential Candidate
Mentioned in relation to the Bush v. Gore Supreme Court case
David Boies Attorney
Described as the attorney who argued for Al Gore and subsequently agreed to represent Virginia Roberts
Virginia Roberts Plaintiff/Victim
Mentioned as being represented by David Boies

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
United States Supreme Court
Venue for Bush v. Gore case
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the document ID 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021910'

Timeline (2 events)

2000
Bush versus Gore Supreme Court case
United States Supreme Court
Unknown
David Boies agrees to represent Virginia Roberts
Unknown

Relationships (2)

David Boies Attorney/Client Al Gore
arguing for the Democratic Presidential Candidate, Al Gore, was David Boies
David Boies Attorney/Client Virginia Roberts
David Boies had agreed to represent Virginia Roberts

Key Quotes (3)

"I knew that David Boies had agreed to represent Virginia Roberts which gave me"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021910.jpg
Quote #1
"probably the most significant United States Supreme Court case argued in the last 20 years was Bush versus Gore"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021910.jpg
Quote #2
"He [David Boies] had put his credibility on the line in arguing the Bush versus Gore case"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021910.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,139 characters)

87
1 getting beyond anything that is a matter of
2 public record.
3 MR. SIMPSON: I just --
4 MS. McCAWLEY: But I appreciate you letting
5 me know that.
6 THE WITNESS: All right. I will not waive
7 anything, and if I start to do that, I would
8 certainly request the opportunity to retract what
9 I'm doing, but I was aware, since the issue is,
10 well, what's in the public record, I was aware
11 that, you know, probably the most significant
12 United States Supreme Court case argued in the
13 last 20 years was Bush versus Gore, which was a
14 case that essentially determined who was going to
15 be President of the most powerful country in the
16 world.
17 There were two attorneys who argued that case
18 in front of the United States Supreme Court and
19 arguing for the Democratic Presidential
20 Candidate, Al Gore, was David Boies. He had put
21 his credibility on the line in arguing the Bush
22 versus Gore case, and without going into any
23 confidential communications or trying to waive in
24 any way, I knew that David Boies had agreed to
25 represent Virginia Roberts which gave me
ROUGH DRAFT ONLY
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021910

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document