MS. McCAWLEY
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unnamed Client/Witness
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Boies
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Marijke Chartouni
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sarah Ransome
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts Giuffre
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed witness
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Boies
|
Professional co interviewees |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
boies
|
Professional representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Paul G. Cassell
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Dershowitz
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Deposition testimony regarding privilege and common interest agreements | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition/Legal Proceeding | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Alan Dershowitz where he denies allegations. | Legal setting | View |
| N/A | Deposition/legal proceeding | Questioning of Ms. Maxwell regarding her responsibility for a journal in 2004-2005. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Recess | A break was taken during the proceeding from 4:39 to 4:54. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition Interruption | Deposition Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition was conducted, as evidenced by the transcript. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Disruption during deposition | Deposition Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Professor Cassell | Deposition Room | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Cross-examination of witness A. Farmer in court case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom | View |
| 2020-07-01 | N/A | ABC News Interviews | On-air | View |
| 2019-09-03 | Court proceeding | An unnamed victim provides a statement in court, followed by an introduction of the next speaker,... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2019-09-03 | Court testimony | Marijke Chartouni provides testimony as a victim in a court proceeding related to Jeffrey Epstein. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-09-03 | Court hearing | A court proceeding where victim Sarah Ransome provides a statement regarding the case involving J... | Courtroom in the Southern D... | View |
| 2017-07-26 | N/A | Legal Deposition | Unknown | View |
| 2009-01-01 | N/A | Deposition Testimony | Unknown | View |
DOJ-OGR-00008300.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated December 9, 2021, detailing the questioning of G. Maxwell. After a brief recess, Maxwell is asked about her responsibility for a journal in 2004-2005, to which her attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, objects. Maxwell then states she does not know the author or contents of the document being presented.
DOJ-OGR-00000697.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on September 3, 2019. It features the testimony of Marijke Chartouni, who identifies herself as a victim of Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operation. She begins to recount how, at age 20, she was introduced to the situation by a friend named Rena.
DOJ-OGR-00000695.jpg
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, containing a victim impact statement by Sarah Ransome. Ransome identifies herself as a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell's sex trafficking ring, thanks the prosecutors of the Southern District of New York, and urges them to continue their investigation, stating that Epstein did not act alone.
DOJ-OGR-00000693.jpg
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, featuring a victim impact statement from an unnamed speaker. The speaker describes her trauma and calls for Ghislaine Maxwell and Sarah Kellen to be held accountable for their roles in helping 'Jeffrey' (implied Epstein) perpetuate a system of abuse. The transcript concludes with Ms. McCawley introducing her client, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, as the next speaker.
DOJ-OGR-00019495.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan on July 21, 2020, arguing that lawyers Boies and McCawley made prejudicial extrajudicial statements in ABC News interviews regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The filing quotes the lawyers describing Maxwell as a 'central figure' who 'worked hand-in-hand' with Epstein and suggesting other participants should be worried. The author requests a court order to prohibit further public comments that could damage Maxwell's right to a fair trial.
DOJ-OGR-00016391.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer, concerning a separate civil case. The witness confirms that lawyers Ms. McCawley and Mr. Edwards, some from the firm Boies Schiller, represent Virginia Roberts, and that the witness was prepared to testify in that civil litigation.
DOJ-OGR-00016388.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (likely Annie Farmer) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The questioning focuses on the timeline of Farmer's legal representation, establishing that she spoke to attorneys in 2016 and retained Boies Schiller (specifically Ms. McCawley) by September 2019. The testimony confirms that these attorneys represented her in a civil lawsuit and filings with the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund.
DOJ-OGR-00013766.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on the witness's knowledge of lawyers Ms. McCawley and Mr. Edwards, from the firm Boies Schiller, representing Virginia Roberts in a separate civil litigation. The witness confirms their knowledge and that they were prepared to testify in that case, despite an objection for relevance which the court overruled.
DOJ-OGR-00013763.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The questioning focuses on when Farmer hired legal counsel, establishing that she spoke to attorneys in 2016 but formally hired the Boies Schiller firm (specifically Ms. McCawley) prior to meeting with the government in September 2019. The text confirms these attorneys filed both a civil lawsuit and documents for the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund on her behalf.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018033.jpg
This is page 4 of a signed affidavit by David S. Stone, dated April 5, 2019. Stone details a 2015 meeting where Alan Dershowitz attempted to convince attorney David Boies that Virginia Roberts (the client) was mistaken in her sexual allegations, suggesting she confused him with Nathan Myhrvold, who frequented Epstein's company. Stone attests that Boies never conceded the allegations were false and notes that Roberts passed a lie detector test.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018031.jpg
Affidavit of David S. Stone in the case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Alan Dershowitz, filed April 16, 2019. Stone details his professional relationships with both Dershowitz and David Boies and describes facilitating meetings between them in May 2015 regarding sexual abuse allegations against Dershowitz. Stone explicitly refutes Dershowitz's claim that Boies stated during a May 19th meeting that Giuffre (referred to as Roberts) was 'mistaken' about the abuse.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015634.jpg
This document is page 14 of a legal response filed by Edwards and Cassell in the case Edwards v. Dershowitz. The text argues that Dershowitz selectively uses parts of Virginia Giuffre's affidavit while attempting to seal the rest, preventing a fair assessment of his claims that her statements are 'preposterous.' The document includes a transcript of a BBC interview from January 2015 where Dershowitz categorically denies the allegations, claims he does not know Giuffre, and threatens the opposing lawyers with defamation suits and disbarment proceedings.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015633.jpg
This document is page 13 of a legal response in the case of Edwards vs. Dershowitz (Case No. CACE 15-000072). It contains a transcript excerpt from a deposition where Alan Dershowitz questions Ms. McCawley's standing, followed by legal commentary regarding a statement released by Ms. McCawley on behalf of David Boies concerning privileged settlement discussions. The document references depositions of Alan Dershowitz from 2015 and 2016.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015632.jpg
This document is a page from a legal response in the case of Edwards vs. Dershowitz, likely part of a House Oversight review. It contains a transcript of Alan Dershowitz's deposition where he vehemently denies ever meeting or touching Virginia Giuffre (Roberts) and denies witnessing Jeffrey Epstein abuse anyone. An attorney, Ms. McCawley, interrupts to object when Dershowitz mentions David Boies and potential settlement discussions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016202.jpg
This document is the final page (page 6) of a sworn declaration by Paul G. Cassell, Esq., filed on July 3, 2019, in the civil case Giuffre v. Maxwell (implied by case number). Cassell asserts that a bar complaint filed by Alan Dershowitz against attorneys Boies and McCawley is frivolous and praises McCawley's devotion to representing sexual abuse victims. The document is notarized in Salt Lake County, Utah, and bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016200.jpg
This document is a legal declaration refuting Alan Dershowitz's public claims that he never traveled without his wife and was never alone with Epstein and young women. The declarant provides specific flight log evidence from 1998, 2004, and 2005 showing Dershowitz on flights with Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and other women, noting specifically that his wife was not listed on these manifests. The document also notes that Dershowitz had personal access to flight logs before they were turned over to law enforcement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021946.jpg
This page is a transcript of a deposition (marked Rough Draft) from a House Oversight investigation. Mr. Simpson questions a witness about a civil complaint styled 'Jane Doe 102 versus Epstein,' confirming that Jane Doe 102 is Virginia Roberts. The questioning focuses on whether the witness asked Virginia Roberts' lawyer, Bob Josefsburg, if the term 'academicians' in said complaint included Alan Dershowitz. Attorney Ms. McCawley asserts privilege regarding communications between Virginia Roberts and her counsel.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021930.jpg
This is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript, likely from the House Oversight Committee's investigation given the Bates stamp. An emotional witness (likely a victim) defends 'multiple girls' against attacks from the questioning attorney's side and requests a break. During the recess (4:01-4:04 p.m.), Mr. and Mrs. Dershowitz leave the room. Attorney Mr. Simpson then attempts to question Mr. Cassell, but is interrupted by Ms. McCawley noting the witness had stepped out for water.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021910.jpg
This page describes a deposition where the witness discusses the credibility of attorney David Boies. The witness draws a parallel between Boies' high-profile work representing Al Gore in the 'Bush v. Gore' Supreme Court case and his decision to represent Virginia Roberts. The witness implies that Boies' involvement gave weight or significance to Roberts' case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021909.jpg
This document is page 86 of a legal deposition transcript (rough draft). The witness testifies that flight logs demonstrate a close association and travel history between Alan Dershowitz and Jeffrey Epstein. The witness then mentions becoming aware on December 30th that attorney David Boies had agreed to represent Virginia Roberts. At this point, attorney Mr. Simpson interrupts the testimony to raise an objection regarding a potential waiver of attorney-client privilege.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021894.jpg
This page is a rough draft transcript from the deposition of Professor Cassell. Attorney Mr. Scarola places an objection on the record regarding Alan Dershowitz's behavior, specifically accusing him of distracting the room by jumping up and excitedly whispering in Mr. Simpson's ear during testimony. Mr. Simpson disagrees with the characterization but agrees to pass notes moving forward.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021892.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft of a legal transcript (Bates stamped House Oversight) where a witness discusses Jeffrey Epstein taking the Fifth Amendment to avoid self-incrimination, specifically regarding his connection to Alan Dershowitz. The testimony is interrupted by a heated exchange between attorneys Mr. Scarola and Ms. McCawley regarding the disruptive behavior of McCawley's client, who was allegedly jumping up and down and using profanity in the room.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021890.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition. A witness testifies about reviewing flight records that placed Mr. Dershowitz on a plane with a woman named Tatiana (or noted as 'one female'), expressing suspicion that this was related to sexual purposes or sex trafficking involving Mr. Epstein. The witness also references Virginia Roberts as a known victim, while attorney Ms. McCawley advises the witness on the scope of their testimony regarding affidavits.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021867.jpg
Page 44 of a rough draft deposition transcript involving a witness identified as Professor Cassell. Attorney Mr. Scarola instructs Cassell not to answer questions to preserve the attorney/client privilege of Virginia Roberts. Mr. Simpson questions whether the witness will consistently follow these instructions, to which the witness agrees.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021864.jpg
This is a page from a deposition transcript marked as a rough draft. An attorney, Mr. Simpson, questions a witness about whether they knew of any witnesses other than Virginia Roberts who could testify that Alan Dershowitz abused a minor at the time the witness signed a pleading on December 30, 2014. The witness asserts they were proud to sign the pleading and believed further discovery would identify witnesses, while Ms. McCawley interjects with a privilege objection.
Legal representation and public record
The witness discusses the credibility of David Boies based on his work in Bush v. Gore and notes his representation of Virginia Roberts.
Jeffrey Epstein's involvement with young girls and David ...
A deposition where an attorney questions a witness about their interactions with David Copperfield, his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, and his knowledge of girls being recruited.
Jeffrey Epstein and David Copperfield
A deposition where an attorney questions a witness about her interactions with David Copperfield, his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, and his alleged knowledge of Epstein's activities with young girls.
Jeffrey Epstein and David Copperfield
A deposition where an attorney questions a witness about her interactions with David Copperfield, his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, and his alleged knowledge of Epstein's activities with young girls.
Introducing next speaker
Ms. McCawley introduces her client, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, as the next person to speak.
Dershowitz's description
Statement asserting Dershowitz's description of what was said is not true.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity