EFTA00028584.pdf
36.7 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email correspondence / legal filing cover letter
File Size:
36.7 KB
Summary
This document is an email from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Dated May 22, 2021, the email submits the Government's opposition to the defense's supplemental pretrial motions. The sender notes they are emailing the document because the electronic filing system prevents them from filing an opposition brief before the original defense motion appears on the public docket.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Addressed as 'Dear Judge Nathan', recipient of the email via chambers address.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the case: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Bobbi C. Sternheim | Defense Counsel |
Cc recipient.
|
| Christian Everdell | Defense Counsel |
Cc recipient.
|
| Laura Menninger | Defense Counsel |
Cc recipient.
|
| Jeff Pagliuca | Defense Counsel |
Cc recipient.
|
| Unknown (Redacted) | Assistant United States Attorney |
Sender of the email.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District of New York (SDNY) |
Jurisdiction of the Assistant United States Attorney sending the email.
|
|
| United States District Court |
Implied by 'nysd.uscourts.gov' email domain.
|
|
| United States Government |
The prosecuting party ('The Government').
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-05-22
Government submission of opposition memorandum to defense's supplemental pretrial motions.
Southern District of New York
Assistant United States Attorney
Judge Nathan
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address of the Southern District of New York office.
|
Relationships (2)
Case name: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell
Cc'd on legal correspondence regarding defense motions.
Key Quotes (3)
"Attached is the Government’s memorandum of law in opposition to the defendant’s supplemental pretrial motions."Source
EFTA00028584.pdf
Quote #1
"The Government is not seeking redactions to the memorandum."Source
EFTA00028584.pdf
Quote #2
"The Government will promptly file its opposition on the public docket after the defense motion is filed."Source
EFTA00028584.pdf
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,054 characters)
From: [REDACTED]
To: "NathanNYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov" <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED]
BOBBI C STERNHEIM <[REDACTED]>, "Christian Everdell" [REDACTED], Laura Menninger [REDACTED], Jeff Pagliuca <[REDACTED]>
Subject: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 02:32:41 +0000
Attachments: 2021.05.21_Government_Opposition_to_Defense_Supplemental_Pretrial_Motions.pdf
To: "NathanNYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov" <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED]
BOBBI C STERNHEIM <[REDACTED]>, "Christian Everdell" [REDACTED], Laura Menninger [REDACTED], Jeff Pagliuca <[REDACTED]>
Subject: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 02:32:41 +0000
Attachments: 2021.05.21_Government_Opposition_to_Defense_Supplemental_Pretrial_Motions.pdf
Dear Judge Nathan,
Attached is the Government’s memorandum of law in opposition to the defendant’s supplemental pretrial motions. The Government is not seeking redactions to the memorandum. However, the electronic case filing system does not accept the filing of opposition briefs where the original motion does not appear on the docket, and the defense motion has not yet been publicly filed. The Government will promptly file its opposition on the public docket after the defense motion is filed.
Respectfully submitted,
[REDACTED]
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
[REDACTED]
New York, NY 10007
[REDACTED]
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
[REDACTED]
New York, NY 10007
[REDACTED]
EFTA00028584
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document