This document is a legal response filed on May 18, 2017, in the Supreme Court of Florida by Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Paul Morris. In response to a court order dated May 3, 2017, Epstein's counsel concedes that they cannot show cause why the precedent set in 'Debrincat v. Fischer' should not control the case, effectively advising the court that it should decline to exercise jurisdiction over Epstein's petition.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Petitioner |
Party bringing the appeal to the Supreme Court of Florida
|
| Bradley J. Edwards | Respondent |
Opposing party in the legal case
|
| Paul Morris | Attorney |
Counsel for Petitioner (Jeffrey Epstein), submitting the filing
|
| Philip M. Burlington | Attorney |
Listed on Service List, opposing counsel from Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court of Florida |
Court where the case is filed
|
|
| Law Offices of Paul Morris, P.A. |
Legal firm representing Epstein
|
|
| Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. |
Legal firm representing Respondents
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
|
Address for Law Offices of Paul Morris, P.A.
|
|
|
Address for Philip M. Burlington
|
"the petitioner would show no cause why Debrincat is not controlling as to the basis for this Court’s jurisdiction, and no cause why this Court should not decline to exercise jurisdiction."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,514 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document