HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031521.jpg
1.51 MB
Extraction Summary
4
People
5
Organizations
5
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
1.51 MB
Summary
This is an email chain from November 11, 2016, between Zubair Khan and Jeffrey Epstein regarding the accuracy of a data prediction model used for the 2016 US Presidential Election. Khan explains the model's success and failures (specifically regarding NY and WI) and informs Epstein that he must shut down the project due to the high cost of Twitter data and lack of funds. Khan indicates he will return to cyber security and contact Epstein later regarding future investment opportunities.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Zubair Khan | Sender/Entrepreneur |
Discussing data analysis of the 2016 election and shutting down a startup project due to lack of funds.
|
| Jeffrey E. | Recipient |
Receiving reports on election data analysis; identified by email jeevacation@gmail.com.
|
| Hillary Clinton | Candidate |
Mentioned as 'hillary' and 'Clinton' in the context of election prediction models and FBI clearance.
|
| Donald Trump | Candidate/President-elect |
Mentioned as dominating social media and predicted winner by Khan's model.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| FBI |
Mentioned regarding Clinton's clearance.
|
|
|
Source of data for the analysis model; noted as expensive.
|
||
|
Platform where the election prediction was posted on Oct 30th.
|
||
| JEE |
Mentioned in the legal disclaimer: 'It is the property of JEE' (likely Jeffrey E. Epstein).
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031521'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2016-10-30
Locations (5)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
State discussed regarding election prediction accuracy.
|
|
|
State discussed regarding election prediction inaccuracy.
|
|
|
United States (Presidential election context).
|
|
|
Mentioned regarding future elections.
|
|
|
Mentioned regarding future elections in 2018.
|
Relationships (1)
Khan reports on project status and says he will 'reach out if I have a powerful investable idea'.
Key Quotes (5)
"Just checked report again. NY is correct. We only got WI wrong."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031521.jpg
Quote #1
"It was hillary no doubt always"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031521.jpg
Quote #2
"Based on this we predicted on our Facebook page on 30th October that Trump will be next president of US."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031521.jpg
Quote #3
"unfortunately I have to shut down this project as getting data from Twitter is expensive and the start up is running out of money."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031521.jpg
Quote #4
"I am going to focus on cyber security again and will definitely reach out if I have a powerful investable idea."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031521.jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,050 characters)
From: Zubair Khan [Redacted]
Sent: 11/11/2016 6:34:29 AM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re:
Sent: 11/11/2016 6:34:29 AM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re:
Importance: High
Just checked report again. NY is correct. We only got WI wrong.
Regards,
Zubair
Zubair
On Fri, 11 Nov 2016 at 10:29 am, jeffrey E. wrote:
New York ? How ? It was hillary no doubt always
New York ? How ? It was hillary no doubt always
On Friday, 11 November 2016, Zubair Khan <[Redacted]> wrote:
Out of 13 states we got 11 right. The ones we got wrong are NY and WI.
Out of 13 states we got 11 right. The ones we got wrong are NY and WI.
In the last report, analyzed data was of 3 days in which Clinton got a positive spike after she got clearance from FBI. However Trump dominated the social media positively if we analyze one week data before starting time of election, monthly data and entire data which we have gathered for months. Based on this we predicted on our Facebook page on 30th October that Trump will be next president of US.
Our model works but I think the important question which we failed to answer is that how much historic data must be analyzed to make the right decision. This could have been answered if we had a Data Scientist. Also I believe its a great tool to track voters and get them to vote. It can be used in French elections next year or elections of Brazil in 2018 but unfortunately I have to shut down this project as getting data from Twitter is expensive and the start up is running out of money.
I am going to focus on cyber security again and will definitely reach out if I have a powerful investable idea.
Regards,
Zubair Khan
Zubair Khan
On Nov 11, 2016, at 4:49 AM, jeffrey E. wrote:
not so good
--
please note
The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
please note
The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031521
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document