This document is an internal email chain dated December 2, 2021, reporting a tip received by an office (likely related to the prosecution or investigation). An unidentified individual called to report that a female in Wisconsin was allegedly attempting to interfere in the ongoing trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The email documents the call and forwards the information for appropriate action.
This document is a Law360 White Collar email newsletter from December 13, 2019. It summarizes various legal news stories, including a $30M bail for a former Braskem executive, a fraud trial involving HP and Autonomy's Mike Lynch, and charges against former NFL players for health plan fraud. The document also lists numerous law firms and companies mentioned in legal proceedings, including 'Epstein Becker Green', though there is no direct context linking this to Jeffrey Epstein's criminal cases in this specific text.
This document is a list of professional activities and speaking engagements from 1994 and 1995, likely from a CV. It details conferences, seminars, grand rounds, and workshops with their host organizations and locations across the US, Canada, Europe, and Asia. Key themes include psychology, law, trauma, memory, and sexual abuse.
This document is a list of academic and professional engagements, likely by a single individual, spanning from 1989 to 1993. It details various conferences, lectures, seminars, and organizational affiliations across numerous universities, legal associations, and psychological societies in the United States, Canada, Australia, and Europe. The entries include the year, event name, and associated institutions or locations.
This document is page vi of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Document 613), filed on February 24, 2022. It is a table of authorities, listing numerous legal cases with their citations and the page numbers where they are referenced in the main document. The cases cited span from 1936 to 2018 and involve various parties in different U.S. federal and state courts.
This is an email chain from November 11, 2016, between Zubair Khan and Jeffrey Epstein regarding the accuracy of a data prediction model used for the 2016 US Presidential Election. Khan explains the model's success and failures (specifically regarding NY and WI) and informs Epstein that he must shut down the project due to the high cost of Twitter data and lack of funds. Khan indicates he will return to cyber security and contact Epstein later regarding future investment opportunities.
This document is a scan of pages 226-227 from a book (likely by James Patterson), stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. Chapter 59 features Dr. Anna Salter, a psychologist based in Madison, Wisconsin, discussing the psychology of sex offenders like Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew in November 2015. She uses a metaphor of a car's motor (impulses) and brakes (control) to explain that sexual offenses against children are always a result of 'bad brakes' (lack of control), regardless of the 'motor' (attraction).
This document contains pages 226 and 227 from a book (likely James Patterson's 'Filthy Rich'), marked as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. Chapter 59 details an analysis by Dr. Anna Salter from November 2015, where she explains the psychology of child sex offenders like Jeffrey Epstein using an analogy of a car's motor (impulses) versus its brakes (control). The text also explicitly links Prince Andrew to Epstein, questioning their public association and shared accusations.
This document is page 41 of a 42-page legal text, specifically from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103), containing footnotes 226 through 238. The text references various legal studies, statutes, and articles concerning prosecutorial discretion, domestic violence laws, political influence on sentencing, and the independence of prosecutors in the US and abroad (Australia, Ireland, Canada). The document was produced by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee, as indicated by the footer and Bates stamp.
This document is an excerpt from a law review article (103 Minn. L. Rev.) discussing the oversight of declination decisions in state justice systems compared to the federal system. It highlights the lack of administrative and judicial review for state prosecutors' charging decisions and details the limited exceptions and historical context through extensive footnotes citing case law.
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103), likely submitted as evidence to the House Oversight Committee by attorney David Schoen. The text analyzes legal underenforcement and systemic bias, specifically regarding police misconduct, sexual assault, and crimes against marginalized groups (sex workers, undocumented immigrants, LGBT individuals). It argues that professional relationships between prosecutors and police create conflicts of interest that prevent fair adjudication, citing various legal standards and academic works.
An email exchange between Eric Maskin and Lawrence Summers (LHS) discussing the merits and drawbacks of Ranked Choice Voting (RCV). Maskin argues RCV favors centrists and could have altered the 2016 election outcome for Clinton, while Summers raises concerns about complexity depressing turnout among specific demographics and mentions pitching the idea to an unnamed individual earlier that day.
This document appears to be a page from a political strategy memo proposing a third-party presidential run. It argues for a 'Democrat-leaning' but moderate candidate who can win specific swing states and pledges to serve only a single four-year term to tackle major issues like Social Security and climate change without re-election concerns. The memo also emphasizes the need for high-entertainment value in the campaign, suggesting involvement from media figures like Stephen Colbert and SNL writers.
This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically the victim's right against unreasonable delay in proceedings. It cites Senators Feinstein and Kyl, along with various state statutes, to argue that delays should not occur merely for the convenience of the court or parties. The document bears the name of David Schoen (a known attorney for Epstein) and a House Oversight Committee stamp, suggesting it was submitted as part of a congressional investigation.
This page from a legal document argues that prosecutors are best situated to notify crime victims of proceedings due to their working relationship and the victims' lack of familiarity with the legal system. It references the 2000 Attorney General Guidelines requiring notification of specific events and provides extensive footnotes citing state statutes that follow this approach.
This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article (page 14 of 52 in the specific filing) discussing proposals to amend legal rules to incorporate the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues for amending Rule 2 to ensure fairness to victims and adding a Rule 10.1 regarding notice of proceedings. The document bears the name of David Schoen (an attorney associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, indicating it was likely submitted as part of a legal argument or evidence file regarding victim rights and notification procedures in the Epstein investigation.
This document is a slide (page 10) from a Deutsche Bank Global Public Affairs presentation stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026804', likely produced during a congressional investigation. It analyzes the field of candidates for the 2016 US Presidential election, categorizing them by party and striking through names of individuals who had suspended their campaigns or declined to run (such as Joe Biden, Scott Walker, and Rick Perry). The slide poses the question of whether it will be a 'multi-billion dollar race' and lists Francis J. Kelly as the Deutsche Bank contact.
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 874) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It critically analyzes the 'Advisory Committee's' narrow interpretation of the Act, contrasting it with the broad legislative intent expressed by Senators Kyl and Feinstein to ensure victims are treated with fairness and due process. The document appears to be part of a production to the House Oversight Committee from the files of David Schoen, a lawyer known for representing Jeffrey Epstein, likely relevant to arguments regarding the violation of victims' rights in the Epstein case.
This document is a forensic extraction of an iMessage log between 'jee' (jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual from June 14, 2019. The conversation consists of sharing news links regarding President Trump's internal polling against Joe Biden and news regarding China, with brief commentary on the polling numbers in Wisconsin.
This document appears to be a page from a political news article or analysis report contained within a House Oversight file (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023485). It discusses a Republican budget plan proposed by Representative Paul Ryan, analyzing its impact on Medicare, tax rates, and social programs. It features commentary from William A. Galston of the Brookings Institution regarding the alignment of Republican fiscal and social policies.
This document is a page from a corporate report (numbered 84) detailing the business strategy and revenue streams of KLC OpCo (likely KinderCare Learning Centers) around 2005. It outlines operations regarding school partnerships, distance learning (via subsidiary KCDL/Keystone National High School), and future expansion plans for community and employer-sponsored centers. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production for a Congressional investigation.
This document is a page from an Ackrell Capital report (Chapter IV: U.S. Legal Landscape) featuring a map and list of U.S. state cannabis laws as of January 2018. It categorizes states by Recreational Law, Medical Cannabis Law, CBD/Limited Law, or No Law. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production to Congress (potentially related to financial investigations involving Epstein or related banks), the content itself is purely market research regarding the cannabis industry and contains no specific mention of Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
This document is a financial summary and projection for an organization identified as 'k12' (likely K12 Inc.), covering fiscal years 2002 through projected 2007. It details revenue growth from $6.7 million in 2002 to a projected $132.2 million in 2007, driven by expansion into new states and grades, though the company operated at a net loss for the recorded historical years (2002-2005). The text outlines the company's operational history, expansion into specific states (CO, PA, OH, ID, CA, AR, MN, AZ, FL, WI, DC, TX, WY, WA), future opportunities in Chicago and Sacramento, and its revenue recognition policies regarding virtual charter school management.
This document appears to be a page from an investment report or business overview regarding 'k12' (K12 Inc.), a virtual education company. It details the company's business model, profitability (noting higher margins due to lack of physical infrastructure), and presence in various US states during the 2006 fiscal year. The document highlights financial projections, specifically a revenue increase in district-managed programs from $3 million in 2006 to a projected $11 million in 2008, and references a 2001 KPMG study validating their curriculum quality.
An email exchange from December 2017 between Jeffrey Epstein and Robert Kuhn regarding the production of a science series titled 'Closer To Truth: Radical Breakthroughs.' Kuhn proposes specific scientific topics and episode structures, explicitly linking the 'Evolutionary Dynamics' topic to Epstein's program at Harvard. Epstein replies with critiques of the 'math candidates,' noting that while they write well, their speaking style and presence are poor ('closer to a C+/').
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity