EFTA00023011.pdf
55.7 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order / appellate decision
File Size:
55.7 KB
Summary
This document is a formal order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021. It affirms previous District Court orders from December 2020 and March 2021 that denied Ghislaine Maxwell's requests for bail pending trial. The court also addresses a complaint made during oral arguments regarding Maxwell's sleep deprivation while incarcerated, directing her counsel to address those specific concerns to the District Court.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant-Appellant |
Appealing denial of bail; also listed as 'Sealed Defendant 1'
|
| Pierre N. Leval | Circuit Judge |
Presiding judge on the panel
|
| Raymond J. Lohier, Jr. | Circuit Judge |
Presiding judge on the panel
|
| Richard J. Sullivan | Circuit Judge |
Presiding judge on the panel
|
| Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe | Clerk of Court |
Signatory for the court
|
Organizations (3)
Timeline (3 events)
2020-12-28
2021-03-22
2021-04-27
United States Court of Appeals affirms District Court's denial of bail for Ghislaine Maxwell.
New York, NY
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where the court term was held
|
Relationships (1)
Defendant-Appellant vs Appellee in court case United States v. Maxwell
Key Quotes (3)
"it is hereby ORDERED that the District Court’s orders are AFFIRMED and that Appellant’s motion for bail... is DENIED."Source
EFTA00023011.pdf
Quote #1
"During oral argument, counsel for Appellant expressed concern that Appellant was improperly being deprived of sleep while incarcerated."Source
EFTA00023011.pdf
Quote #2
"To the extent Appellant seeks relief specific to her sleeping conditions, such request should be addressed to the District Court."Source
EFTA00023011.pdf
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,336 characters)
21-58-cr (L), 21-770-cr
United States v. Maxwell
United States v. Maxwell
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE
SECOND CIRCUIT
FOR THE
SECOND CIRCUIT
At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the
Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the
27th day of April, two thousand twenty-one.
Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the
27th day of April, two thousand twenty-one.
PRESENT: PIERRE N. LEVAL,
RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR.,
RICHARD J. SULLIVAN,
Circuit Judges.
RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR.,
RICHARD J. SULLIVAN,
Circuit Judges.
United States of America,
Appellee,
v.
21-58-cr (L)
21-770-cr
Appellee,
v.
21-58-cr (L)
21-770-cr
Ghislaine Maxwell, AKA Sealed Defendant 1,
Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell appeals from orders of the District Court entered
December 28, 2020 and March 22, 2021, which denied her renewed requests for bail pending trial.
See Dkts. 1, 20. Upon due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that the District Court’s orders
are AFFIRMED and that Appellant’s motion for bail, or in the alternative, temporary pretrial
release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i), Dkt. 39, is DENIED. During oral argument, counsel for
Appellant expressed concern that Appellant was improperly being deprived of sleep while
incarcerated. To the extent Appellant seeks relief specific to her sleeping conditions, such request
should be addressed to the District Court.
December 28, 2020 and March 22, 2021, which denied her renewed requests for bail pending trial.
See Dkts. 1, 20. Upon due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that the District Court’s orders
are AFFIRMED and that Appellant’s motion for bail, or in the alternative, temporary pretrial
release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i), Dkt. 39, is DENIED. During oral argument, counsel for
Appellant expressed concern that Appellant was improperly being deprived of sleep while
incarcerated. To the extent Appellant seeks relief specific to her sleeping conditions, such request
should be addressed to the District Court.
FOR THE COURT:
Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court
[Signature Stamp]
Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court
[Signature Stamp]
EFTA00023011
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document