EFTA00014661.pdf

110 KB

Extraction Summary

8
People
6
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email thread / legal correspondence
File Size: 110 KB
Summary

This document contains an email exchange between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Laura Menninger, and US Prosecutors regarding Local Criminal Rule 23.1, which limits press statements. Menninger initially flags comments made by attorney Spencer Kuvin in 'The Sun' as a potential violation. The prosecution responds that Kuvin does not represent any trial witnesses, but counters that Maxwell's own appellate attorney, David Markus, may have violated the rule via statements to the 'NY Post'.

People (8)

Name Role Context
Laura Menninger Attorney
Defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell; initiates the email chain regarding Rule 23.1 violations.
Spencer Kuvin Attorney
Subject of the email inquiry; quoted in The Sun. Government confirms he does not represent trial witnesses.
David Markus Attorney
Attorney for Ms. Maxwell; Government alleges he made public statements in the NY Post that may violate Rule 23.1.
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Mentioned as 'Ms. Maxwell'; subject of the legal case and press articles.
Judge Nathan Judge
Presided over an arraignment mentioned in the email.
Jeff Pagliuca Attorney
CC recipient on the email chain.
Christian Everdell Attorney
CC recipient on the email chain.
Bobbi Sternheim Attorney
CC recipient on the email chain.

Organizations (6)

Name Type Context
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
Law firm representing the defense (Laura Menninger).
USANYS
U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (Prosecution).
The Sun
Newspaper that published statements by Spencer Kuvin.
NY Post
Newspaper that published statements by David Markus.
Second Circuit
Court where David Markus filed a notice of appearance.
Cohen Gresser
Law firm (Christian Everdell's email domain).

Timeline (3 events)

2021-04-XX
Arraignment of Ghislaine Maxwell before Judge Nathan.
Court (likely SDNY)
2021-05-05
Article published in NY Post quoting David Markus.
Published Media
2021-05-06
Article published in The Sun quoting Spencer Kuvin.
Published Media

Locations (2)

Location Context
Address of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
Implied location of USANYS and the Court.

Relationships (3)

Laura Menninger Attorney/Client Ghislaine Maxwell
Menninger is defense counsel.
David Markus Attorney/Client Ghislaine Maxwell
Email states Markus filed notice of appearance on behalf of Ms. Maxwell.
Spencer Kuvin Source/Media The Sun
Kuvin quoted in The Sun article discussed in email.

Key Quotes (3)

"To our knowledge, Spencer Kuvin does not represent any of the witnesses the Government expects to call at trial in this case."
Source
EFTA00014661.pdf
Quote #1
"David Markus... has also made public statements to the press regarding this case, which run the risk of violating the rule."
Source
EFTA00014661.pdf
Quote #2
"The linked article by the Sun dated yesterday contains a number of statements which, if made by a lawyer associated with a witness in this case, appear to violate Local Criminal Rule 23.1."
Source
EFTA00014661.pdf
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,488 characters)

From: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
To: Laura Menninger , "[REDACTED] (USANYS)" <[REDACTED]>, "[REDACTED]"
Cc: Jeff Pagliuca , "'ceverdell@cohengresser.com'" , "'Bobbi Sternheim (bcsternheim@mac.com)'"
Subject: RE: Conferral Regarding Possible Violation of Local Criminal Rule 23.1
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 03:03:03 +0000
Inline-Images: image001.jpg
Counsel,
To our knowledge, Spencer Kuvin does not represent any of the witnesses the Government expects to call at trial in this case. Because this individual does not represent any witnesses in this case, we do not see a need to raise this issue with the Court.
We agree that compliance with Local Rule 23.1 is important. To that end, we note that David Markus, an attorney who has filed a notice of appearance in the Second Circuit on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, and who was present for the arraignment before Judge Nathan last month, has also made public statements to the press regarding this case, which run the risk of violating the rule. See, e.g., https://nypost.com/2021/05/05/ghislaine-maxwell-on-enhanced-security-schedule-lockup-feds/
Our hope is that by alerting you to this concern now, there will not be a need in the future to raise the issue with the Court.
Best,
[REDACTED]
From: Laura Menninger
Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 5:18 PM
To: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Cc: Jeff Pagliuca ; 'ceverdell@cohengresser.com' ; 'Bobbi Sternheim (bcsternheim@mac.com)'
Subject: Conferral Regarding Possible Violation of Local Criminal Rule 23.1
Counsel –
The linked article by the Sun dated yesterday contains a number of statements which, if made by a lawyer associated with a witness in this case, appear to violate Local Criminal Rule 23.1. See also Dkt. No. 28 (expectation of strict compliance with Rule 23.1 by "counsel for all involved parties"). The rule applies by its terms to any "lawyer participating in or associated with the investigation (including ... lawyers for targets, subjects, and witnesses in the investigation...)."
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/14875477/ghislaine-maxwell-plea-deal-same-fate-as-epstein/
I am writing to confer with you prior to bringing this to the Court's attention. Please let me know if you believe Mr. Spencer Kuvin represents any witness in this case.
Given the urgency of this situation, I would appreciate a response by close of business Monday.
Thanks,
Laura
Laura A. Menninger
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
150 East 10th Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80203
lmenninger@hmflaw.com
www.hmflaw.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you must not read this transmission and that any disclosure, copying, printing, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by telephone or return e-mail and delete the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving it in any manner. Thank you.
EFTA00014662

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document