DOJ-OGR-00008799.jpg

417 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court filing / government letter motion
File Size: 417 KB
Summary

This document is page 2 of a government filing dated January 5, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). The Government requests that the Court schedule a hearing/inquiry regarding a juror's recent public statements about sexual abuse and honesty during voir dire, citing specific legal precedents. The document notes that defense counsel was contacted but had not yet responded, and it includes a link to a Reuters article about the juror's admission.

People (4)

Name Role Context
The Juror Juror
Subject of a proposed inquiry regarding statements made about sexual abuse and honesty during selection.
Defense Counsel Legal Defense
Representing the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell); contacted by the Government but had not yet responded.
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Implied by case number 1:20-cr-00330-PAE and explicitly mentioned in the footnote URL.
The Court Judiciary
Requested by the Government to conduct an inquiry and supervise juror investigation.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
The Government
Author of the filing requesting a hearing.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Cited in legal precedents (2d Cir.).
Reuters
Source of the news article cited in footnote 2 regarding juror statements.

Timeline (1 events)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by case number and context.

Relationships (2)

The Government Adversarial Legal Parties Defense Counsel
Government reached out to defense counsel regarding juror statements.
The Court Supervisory The Juror
Government suggests Court's staff contact the juror and supervise investigation.

Key Quotes (4)

"he would have answered honestly."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00008799.jpg
Quote #1
"The Government believes the Court should conduct an inquiry."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00008799.jpg
Quote #2
"The Government respectfully submits that any juror investigation should be conducted exclusively under the supervision of the Court."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00008799.jpg
Quote #3
"The Government reached out to defense counsel last night regarding the juror’s statements, but defense counsel have not yet responded"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00008799.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,313 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 568 Filed 01/05/22 Page 2 of 3
sexual abuse, but stated that “he would have answered honestly.”²
Based on the foregoing, the Government believes the Court should conduct an inquiry. See, e.g., United States v. Langford, 990 F.2d 65, 68-69 (2d Cir. 1993). The Government proposes that the Court schedule a hearing in approximately one month, along with an appropriate schedule for pre-hearing briefing regarding the applicable law and the scope of the hearing. The Government respectfully submits that any juror investigation should be conducted exclusively under the supervision of the Court. See, e.g., United States v. Gagnon, 282 F. App’x 39, 40 (2d Cir. 2008). If the Court decides to schedule such a hearing, the Government respectfully suggests that the Court’s staff promptly contact the juror to notify him of the hearing and inquire whether he would like counsel to be appointed in connection with it.
The Government reached out to defense counsel last night regarding the juror’s statements, but defense counsel have not yet responded and thus the Government is not aware of the defense position on this issue.
² See https://www.reuters.com/world/us/some-ghislaine-maxwell-jurors-initially-doubted-accusers-juror-says-2022-01-05/.
[REDACTED BLOCK]
2
DOJ-OGR-00008799

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document