The Juror
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The Court
|
Supervisory |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Juror defendant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Juror defendant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Social media connection |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-01 | N/A | Voir Dire | Court | View |
| 2022-01-01 | N/A | Proposed Hearing | Court | View |
| 2021-01-01 | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell Trial | Court | View |
| 0023-12-01 | N/A | Jury Deliberations | Jury Room | View |
DOJ-OGR-00008968.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing (Document 604) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 17, 2022. The text presents a legal argument regarding juror misconduct, asserting that a juror hid a central issue during selection that they later raised during deliberations. The filing argues that the defense should not be required to prove the juror's 'willfulness' to obtain relief, citing Supreme Court precedents (Sheppard v. Maxwell, Irvin v. Dowd) regarding fair trials for unpopular defendants facing adverse publicity.
DOJ-OGR-00010026.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on March 24, 2022. It features the direct examination of Ms. Brune (a former AUSA), questioning her decision not to alert the Court about Google search results regarding a juror found around March 12th. Brune testifies that she did not report it because she relied on the juror's sworn statements claiming to be a 'stay at home wife,' leading Brune to believe the search results referred to a different person.
DOJ-OGR-00009347.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (page 286) filed on February 24, 2022. It features the direct examination testimony of Ms. Brune (likely a defense attorney), who is being questioned about her failure to bring Google search results regarding a juror to the Court's attention during or after voir dire. Brune defends her actions by stating she believed the information she found referred to a different person than the juror, based on the juror's sworn statements claiming to be a 'stay at home wife' rather than an attorney. Brune also affirms her obligation to the Court remains the same as when she was an Assistant US Attorney (AUSA).
DOJ-OGR-00008807.jpg
This document is a Court Order filed on January 5, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order establishes a briefing schedule for the Defense's motion for a new trial and addresses the appointment of counsel for a juror regarding potential inquiries into juror conduct. The document also notes that the court will not adjourn post-trial briefing on other issues.
DOJ-OGR-00008799.jpg
This document is page 2 of a government filing dated January 5, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). The Government requests that the Court schedule a hearing/inquiry regarding a juror's recent public statements about sexual abuse and honesty during voir dire, citing specific legal precedents. The document notes that defense counsel was contacted but had not yet responded, and it includes a link to a Reuters article about the juror's admission.
Unknown
Juror was posting on social media, which contradicted his statement that he didn't think anyone would know.
Telling my story
Thanks for telling my story.
Juror experience
I can now tell everybody that I was a juror on the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. What an incredible, surreal experience.
Unknown
Mr. Everdell references a post the juror made to Annie Farmer.
History of sexual abuse
The juror telling reporters about his history of sexual abuse.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity