HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022250.jpg
1.42 MB
Extraction Summary
5
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
4
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
1.42 MB
Summary
This document is an email chain from April 3, 2011, between Jeffrey Epstein, Lesley Groff, Darren Indyke, and Scott Denett. The conversation revolves around a forwarded commentary on a New York Post article about Epstein's return to NYC, his controversial quotes, and questions directed at D.A. Cyrus Vance Jr. The participants also discuss technical difficulties in accessing highlights made by Epstein ('Je') on related documents.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Email Sender/Recipient |
Sender of the top email from jeevacation@gmail.com. CC'd on an email from Darren Indyke. Referred to as 'Je'. Subject...
|
| Darren Indyke | Email Sender |
Sent an email to Lesley Groff, CC'ing Jeffrey Epstein, about not having 'Je's highlights' from documents.
|
| Lesley Groff | Email Recipient/Sender |
Recipient of emails from Scott Denett and Darren Indyke. Forwards a message and discusses how to share highlights of ...
|
| Scott Denett | Email Sender |
Sent the initial forwarded message to Lesley Groff. The message contains commentary on a NY Post article about Jeffre...
|
| Cyrus R. Vance Jr. | Manhattan D.A. |
Mentioned in Scott Denett's email, which questions why Vance allowed Epstein, a Level 3 sex offender, to reside near ...
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| NY Post |
Newspaper that published an article about Jeffrey Epstein's return to NYC and his comments.
|
|
| The Post |
Another reference to the NY Post.
|
|
| AT&T |
Mentioned in the 'Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T' signature.
|
|
| HOUSE_OVERSIGHT |
Appears as part of a Bates number at the bottom of the document, likely referring to the House Oversight Committee.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2011-04-03
An email discussion occurred between Jeffrey Epstein, his associates (Lesley Groff, Darren Indyke), and Scott Denett regarding media commentary on Epstein's return to NYC and technical difficulties in viewing related documents.
N/A (Virtual)
Prior to 2011-04-03
Jeffrey Epstein returned to New York City after a jail stint, as reported in the NY Post.
New York City
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where Jeffrey Epstein returned after his jail stint, according to the NY Post article.
|
|
|
Mentioned as being next to Epstein's residence in New York.
|
Relationships (4)
Groff is involved in managing communications and documents for Epstein, as seen in the email chain.
Indyke is CC'd with Epstein and discusses 'Je's highlights', indicating a working relationship.
Denett sends an email with commentary about Epstein to Groff.
They are corresponding about work-related documents concerning Jeffrey Epstein.
Key Quotes (5)
"I'm not a sexual predator, I'm an 'offender,'"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022250.jpg
Quote #1
"It's the difference between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel,"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022250.jpg
Quote #2
"Why did Cyrus R. Vance Jr., the Manhattan D.A., allow a Level 3 sex offender (the most dangerous kind) to reside -- even for ten minutes -- in a house that is right next to Central Park and a school?"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022250.jpg
Quote #3
"I also could only open 1st doc and don't have Je's highlights from the other docs."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022250.jpg
Quote #4
"try opening in firefox"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022250.jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,189 characters)
Date: Sunday, April 3 2011 07:15 PM
Subject: Re: raw text
From: Jeffrey Epstein
To: [REDACTED]
try opening in firefox
Subject: Re: raw text
From: Jeffrey Epstein
To: [REDACTED]
try opening in firefox
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 1:50 PM, <[REDACTED]> wrote:
Ok. So if you would like [REDACTED] or [REDACTED] to call me and possibly they could read off to me.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
From: Darren Indyke [REDACTED]
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 12:54:56 -0400
To: Lesley Groff<[REDACTED]>
Cc: Jeffrey Epstein
Subject: Re: raw text
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 12:54:56 -0400
To: Lesley Groff<[REDACTED]>
Cc: Jeffrey Epstein
Subject: Re: raw text
I also could only open 1st doc and don't have Je's highlights from the other docs.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 3, 2011, at 10:08 AM, Lesley Groff <[REDACTED]> wrote:
On Apr 3, 2011, at 10:08 AM, Lesley Groff <[REDACTED]> wrote:
Scott was able to send me the attachments below but there are no highlights. Darren, if you want to call me and read me the highlights, I can type them on a Word Doc as you dictate...(?) (Even when Scott opened them on his end he had no highlights)
-------- Forwarded message --------
From: Scott Denett [REDACTED]
Date: Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 10:04 AM
Subject: raw text
To: Lesley Groff <[REDACTED]>
From: Scott Denett [REDACTED]
Date: Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 10:04 AM
Subject: raw text
To: Lesley Groff <[REDACTED]>
According to Friday's NY Post Jeffrey Epstein returned to New York City "making wisecracks about his just-ended jail stint for having sex with an underage girl". "I'm not a sexual predator, I'm an 'offender,' " the Wall Street hedge fund manager told The Post. "It's the difference between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel," said Epstein.
Well that's not exactly the correct analogy...
Not only are Epstein's comments brazen, they are arrogant and self-implicating. By telling a reporter "I'm an offender", he seems to be admitting guilt.
Which brings me to the big question of the day. Why did Cyrus R. Vance Jr., the Manhattan D.A., allow a Level 3 sex offender (the most dangerous kind) to reside -- even for ten minutes -- in a house that is right next to Central Park and a school? Isn't that unlawful given the housing guidelines for sex offenders?
According to the NYPost, Epstein's Level 3 designation means that he is at "high risk" to repeat his offense and poses "a threat to public safety."
When I rang Vance (twice) to discuss Epstein's residential guidelines he did not take my calls.
Well that's not exactly the correct analogy...
Not only are Epstein's comments brazen, they are arrogant and self-implicating. By telling a reporter "I'm an offender", he seems to be admitting guilt.
Which brings me to the big question of the day. Why did Cyrus R. Vance Jr., the Manhattan D.A., allow a Level 3 sex offender (the most dangerous kind) to reside -- even for ten minutes -- in a house that is right next to Central Park and a school? Isn't that unlawful given the housing guidelines for sex offenders?
According to the NYPost, Epstein's Level 3 designation means that he is at "high risk" to repeat his offense and poses "a threat to public safety."
When I rang Vance (twice) to discuss Epstein's residential guidelines he did not take my calls.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022250
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document