EFTA00026681.pdf
69.7 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email correspondence
File Size:
69.7 KB
Summary
This document is an email chain from July 2019 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and attorney Roberta Kaplan (along with her team). The AUSA contacts Kaplan regarding 'U.S. v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490' to inform her of her client's rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act to be heard during upcoming bail proceedings. Kaplan responds briefly asking to talk.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Roberta Kaplan | Attorney |
Sender of the top email; Partner at Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP; representing a victim.
|
| Jenna Dabbs | Attorney |
Recipient of the emails.
|
| Alexandra Elenowitz-Hess | Attorney |
Recipient of the emails.
|
| Conlon | Recipient |
First name redacted, recipient of the emails.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Mentioned in the subject line 'U.S. v. Epstein'.
|
| Assistant U.S. Attorney | Government Prosecutor |
Sender of the initial email (name redacted); Southern District of New York.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP |
Law firm representing Roberta Kaplan.
|
|
| Southern District of New York |
U.S. Attorney's Office handling the Epstein case.
|
|
| U.S. District Court |
implied by case citation 19 Cr. 490.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2019-07-12
Bail submission due date mentioned in the email.
Southern District of New York
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP office (zip 10118).
|
|
|
Jurisdiction of the Assistant U.S. Attorney.
|
Relationships (2)
Email correspondence regarding victim rights in U.S. v. Epstein.
Included on the same email chain representing the same interests.
Key Quotes (3)
"pursuant to the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, specifically 18 U.S.C. 3771(a)(4), a crime victim has the right to be reasonably heard at certain public proceedings in the district court, including proceedings involving release."Source
EFTA00026681.pdf
Quote #1
"we wanted to be in touch consistent with our responsibilities and obligations—and your client’s rights—under that statute, to see whether your client would like to be heard in any fashion"Source
EFTA00026681.pdf
Quote #2
"Can you talk?"Source
EFTA00026681.pdf
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,467 characters)
From: Roberta Kaplan <[Redacted]>
To: "[Redacted] [Redacted])" <[Redacted]>, "[Redacted] Conlon" <[Redacted]>, Jenna Dabbs <[Redacted]>, Alexandra Elenowitz-Hess <[Redacted]>
Cc: "[Redacted])" <[Redacted]>, "[Redacted])" <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: U.S. v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 -- victims' rights re: bail hearing
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 02:06:10 +0000
To: "[Redacted] [Redacted])" <[Redacted]>, "[Redacted] Conlon" <[Redacted]>, Jenna Dabbs <[Redacted]>, Alexandra Elenowitz-Hess <[Redacted]>
Cc: "[Redacted])" <[Redacted]>, "[Redacted])" <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: U.S. v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 -- victims' rights re: bail hearing
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 02:06:10 +0000
Can you talk?
Roberta ("Robbie") Kaplan, Esq.
Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP
[Redacted]
New York, New York 10118
[Redacted]
Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP
[Redacted]
New York, New York 10118
[Redacted]
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 5:56:39 PM
To: [Redacted] Conlon; Roberta Kaplan; Jenna Dabbs; Alexandra Elenowitz-Hess
Cc: [Redacted]; [Redacted]
Subject: RE: U.S. v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 -- victims' rights re: bail hearing
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 5:56:39 PM
To: [Redacted] Conlon; Roberta Kaplan; Jenna Dabbs; Alexandra Elenowitz-Hess
Cc: [Redacted]; [Redacted]
Subject: RE: U.S. v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 -- victims' rights re: bail hearing
Hi all,
As you may already know, pursuant to the Crime Victims' Rights Act, specifically 18 U.S.C. 3771(a)(4), a crime victim has the right to be reasonably heard at certain public proceedings in the district court, including proceedings involving release.
Accordingly, we wanted to be in touch consistent with our responsibilities and obligations—and your client’s rights—under that statute, to see whether your client would like to be heard in any fashion, whether through a submission, a representation that we can include in our bail submission due Friday, or some other form. Of course no requirement or obligation, but we would be happy to discuss it if that would be useful.
Accordingly, we wanted to be in touch consistent with our responsibilities and obligations—and your client’s rights—under that statute, to see whether your client would like to be heard in any fashion, whether through a submission, a representation that we can include in our bail submission due Friday, or some other form. Of course no requirement or obligation, but we would be happy to discuss it if that would be useful.
To the extent this information is useful in your consideration, I can say that while I don’t want to prejudge the
Would it make sense to set up a brief call sometime tomorrow, if any of you want to discuss? I should be able to make myself available whenever is convenient for you (and likely will be just me, as the remainder of the team will be traveling).
thank you,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
EFTA00026681
[Redacted]
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Southern District of New York
[Redacted]
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Southern District of New York
[Redacted]
This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
EFTA00026682
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document