EFTA00019471.pdf
48.5 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
3
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
48.5 KB
Summary
This document is an email chain from August and September 2019 involving the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the case 'US v. Epstein'. The correspondence discusses the technical processing of evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan residence, specifically loading data extracted from hard drives into the Relativity platform for privilege review. It clarifies that the data in question originated from the Manhattan search warrant returns and explicitly excludes materials seized from the US Virgin Islands.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant/Subject |
Subject of the case US v. Epstein; owner of Manhattan residence where devices were seized.
|
| Redacted | Assistant United States Attorney |
SDNY prosecutor involved in US v. Epstein correspondence.
|
| Redacted Senders/Recipients | Gov/Legal Personnel |
Discussing data loading into Relativity and privilege review.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District of New York (SDNY) |
Prosecuting office handling the case.
|
|
| Relativity |
e-Discovery software platform used for hosting the data for privilege review.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Prior to 2019-08-29
Seizure of devices from Epstein's Manhattan residence pursuant to a search warrant.
Manhattan residence
Law Enforcement
Jeffrey Epstein
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where devices were seized pursuant to a search warrant.
|
|
|
Location mentioned as excluded from this specific data load.
|
|
|
Office address of the Assistant United States Attorney.
|
Relationships (1)
Email subject 'US v. Epstein' and AUSA signature block.
Key Quotes (4)
"The materials on the drive were extracted from devices seized from Epstein’s Manhattan residence pursuant to a search warrant."Source
EFTA00019471.pdf
Quote #1
"It does not include materials seized from USVI."Source
EFTA00019471.pdf
Quote #2
"The data from the hard drive has been loaded to Relativity and has been secured for privilege review."Source
EFTA00019471.pdf
Quote #3
"Is the Epstein data that we are loading Search Warrant returns? And was Epstein the only custodian?"Source
EFTA00019471.pdf
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,366 characters)
From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: US v. Epstein
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:26:34 +0000
To: [REDACTED]
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: US v. Epstein
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:26:34 +0000
The data from the hard drive has been loaded to Relativity and has been secured for privilege review.
Thank you.
[REDACTED]
From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 11:12 AM
To: [REDACTED]
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: Re: US v. Epstein
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 11:12 AM
To: [REDACTED]
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: Re: US v. Epstein
Thanks [REDACTED].
[REDACTED]
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
One St. Andrews Plaza
New York, NY 10007
[REDACTED]
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
One St. Andrews Plaza
New York, NY 10007
[REDACTED]
On Aug 29, 2019, at 11:10 AM, [REDACTED] wrote:
Hi [REDACTED],
The materials on the drive were extracted from devices seized from Epstein’s Manhattan residence pursuant to a search warrant.
It does not include materials seized from USVI.
Thanks,
[REDACTED]
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 29, 2019, at 10:17 AM, [REDACTED] wrote:
[REDACTED],
Is the Epstein data that we are loading Search Warrant returns? And was Epstein the only custodian?
Thanks, [REDACTED]
EFTA00019471
From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 10:08 AM
To: [REDACTED]
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: US v. Epstein
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 10:08 AM
To: [REDACTED]
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: US v. Epstein
Hello [REDACTED],
Can you please let me know if there is a specific custodian for this priv review for Epstein? Also, can you please let me know where this data should be loaded into Relativity (subpoena returns or something else)?
Thank you.
[REDACTED]
EFTA00019472
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document