This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a procedural discussion in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Attorney Ms. Menninger expresses concern that the government's rebuttal might become a second closing argument and requests the court enforce a rule to limit its scope. In response, attorney Ms. Comey assures the judge that the rebuttal will be significantly shorter than the closing, adhering to the standard practice in the district, a position the court affirms.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, responds "Yes." to the court.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, presiding over the proceeding.
|
| MS. MENNINGER | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, requests clarification on the rules for rebuttal arguments.
|
| MS. COMEY | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, responds to Ms. Menninger's inquiry, assuring the court the rebuttal will be brief.
|
| Hyppolite | Unknown (likely witness or party) |
Mentioned in the header: "Hyppolite - direct".
|
| law clerk | Law Clerk |
Mentioned by the Court: "check with my law clerk."
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the document as the court reporting service.
|
| government | government agency |
Mentioned by Ms. Menninger in the context of legal proceedings, likely referring to the prosecution.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C." and mentioned by Ms. Comey as "this district".
|
"May I inquire, your Honor? In some courtrooms I've been in there is a rule, perhaps not strongly enforced, but strongly suggested, that the government only reserve a certain portion of their summation for the rebuttal piece because otherwise it ends up being a bit of a more in rebuttal than in the actual substance."Source
"Your Honor, I expect the rebuttal will be significantly shorter than the closing. I don't think that's going to be an issue."Source
"Well, it certainly should be. It should be rebuttal and not --"Source
"I fully intend it to be much shorter than the closing and to the point, as is consistent with our office practice before your Honor and in this district."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,369 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document