EFTA00024873.pdf
111 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain / official correspondence
File Size:
111 KB
Summary
This document contains an email chain between the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) from July 2020. The correspondence details the volume of evidence collected by OPR during its investigation into the handling of the Epstein case, specifically citing approximately 516,000 emails obtained from 5 subjects and roughly 19,000 pages of scanned hard copy documents. The USANYS is requesting copies of these materials for use in ongoing litigation, prompting OPR to request a discussion regarding the legal implications of sharing internal investigation records.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Redacted | Sender/Recipient |
Multiple individuals from OPR and USANYS, names redacted.
|
| Redacted | Chief, Public Corruption |
USAO-SDNY official addressed in the email.
|
| Line AUSA | Subject of investigation |
Unidentified AUSA who remained involved with CVRA litigation until mid-2019 and accounts for the vast majority of the...
|
| 5 subjects | Subjects of investigation |
USAO employees whose emails were obtained by OPR.
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Southern District of New York
|
Key Quotes (4)
"Total number of email files obtained for the 5 subjects -> approximately 516,000."Source
EFTA00024873.pdf
Quote #1
"It is our best ballpark estimate that we determined approximately 3,000 unique emails were directly relevant to OPR's investigation"Source
EFTA00024873.pdf
Quote #2
"we need to consider issues raised by having OPR provide its records for a case in litigation."Source
EFTA00024873.pdf
Quote #3
"includes both the production to petitioners (3,754 pages), and a separate collection of privileged documents/records (about 15,267 pages)"Source
EFTA00024873.pdf
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (3,999 characters)
From: [Redacted] (OPR)" <[Redacted]>
To: "[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
Cc: "[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Numbers you requested
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:52:00 +0000
To: "[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
Cc: "[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Numbers you requested
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:52:00 +0000
Yes, of course. I'll call the given number, then.
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 2:18 PM
To: [Redacted] (OPR) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Numbers you requested
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 2:18 PM
To: [Redacted] (OPR) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Numbers you requested
[Redacted] -- With apologies, any chance we can push this call to 4:30?
From: [Redacted] (OPR) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 6:07 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (OPR) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (OPR) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Numbers you requested
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 6:07 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (OPR) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (OPR) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Numbers you requested
Perfect. I'll leave logistics to you.
Best,
[Redacted]
Best,
[Redacted]
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 27, 2020, at 6:05 PM, [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]> wrote:
Sure, no problem. Would 4 tomorrow work for you? If so, we can give you a call then or circulate a dial in if that's easier.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 27, 2020, at 5:28 PM, [Redacted] (OPR) <[Redacted]> wrote:
[Redacted], we're not clear about what you mean by "the materials [OPR] obtained," and we need to consider issues raised by having OPR provide its records for a case in litigation. Could I speak with you (or whoever on your team you wish) to get a better understanding of what you're looking to get?
I'm available tomorrow afternoon at or after 3:30, or anytime Wednesday.
Best regards,
[Redacted]
I'm available tomorrow afternoon at or after 3:30, or anytime Wednesday.
Best regards,
[Redacted]
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 3:51 PM
To: [Redacted] (OPR) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (OPR) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (OPR) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Numbers you requested
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 3:51 PM
To: [Redacted] (OPR) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (OPR) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (OPR) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Numbers you requested
Thanks very much, [Redacted]. This is extremely helpful. I think it does make sense for us to talk further about how we might be able to get copies from you of the materials you obtained, including the 500,000+ emails and the 15-20,000 scanned hard copy documents. I've copied our team, whom I believe you've been in touch with already, [Redacted], [Redacted], and [Redacted]. Would you mind if I put them back in touch with you or the appropriate person in your office to talk through the logistics of obtaining copies of these materials?
Thanks again,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
From: [Redacted] (OPR) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 10:46 AM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (OPR) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (OPR) <[Redacted]>
Subject: Numbers you requested
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 10:46 AM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (OPR) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (OPR) <[Redacted]>
Subject: Numbers you requested
AUSA [Redacted]
Chief, Public Corruption
USAO-SDNY
Chief, Public Corruption
USAO-SDNY
[Redacted] --
Following are some numbers you requested.
1. Total number of email files obtained for the 5 subjects -> approximately 516,000.
This does not count attachments (e.g., correspondence, drafts, final documents, press report, etc.) as separate files.
Note that for subjects who left the USAO during the pendency of the Epstein case, there are fewer, and that the line AUSA (who remained involved with the CVRA litigation until mid-2019) accounts for the vast majority of the files.
This does not count attachments (e.g., correspondence, drafts, final documents, press report, etc.) as separate files.
Note that for subjects who left the USAO during the pendency of the Epstein case, there are fewer, and that the line AUSA (who remained involved with the CVRA litigation until mid-2019) accounts for the vast majority of the files.
2. It is our best ballpark estimate that we determined approximately 3,000 unique emails were directly relevant to OPR's investigation, but we certainly considered a larger universe.
3. Our best (most useful) collection of scanned-in USAO hard copy documents is from the CVRA litigation, and includes both the production to petitioners (3,754 pages), and a separate collection of privileged documents/records (about 15,267 pages) that were submitted to the court (and that remained privileged).
We also have hundreds of pages of other case documents in both hard copy format and electronically, but they are largely duplicative of these two sets and are difficult to quantify.
We also have hundreds of pages of other case documents in both hard copy format and electronically, but they are largely duplicative of these two sets and are difficult to quantify.
We hope this is helpful.
Regards,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
EFTA00024873
EFTA00024874
EFTA00024874
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document