This document is page 40 of 52 from a legal text, specifically citing the 2005 BYU Law Review, discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It proposes amendments to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 32 and 43.1 to expand victims' rights regarding sentencing recommendations and attendance at trials. The document bears the name David Schoen (Epstein's attorney) and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| David Schoen | Author/Submitter |
Name appears at the bottom of the document; he is a prominent attorney known for representing Jeffrey Epstein.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Advisory Committee |
Mentioned in relation to coordinating with the Sentencing Commission.
|
|
| Sentencing Commission |
Mentioned regarding consistency of actions.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Inferred from the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017754'.
|
|
| BYU Law Review |
Document source cited in header (2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835).
|
"Rule 32(i)(4) should be amended to conform the definition of victim to that found in the CVRA"Source
"A victim has the right to attend any public court proceeding, unless the court... determines that testimony by the victim would be materially altered"Source
"Rule 32 currently contains a definition of 'victim' that is narrower than the CVRA's definition."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (3,577 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document