HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013319.jpg
1.35 MB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing (statement of undisputed facts)
File Size:
1.35 MB
Summary
This document is a 'Statement of Undisputed Facts' filed by defendant Bradley J. Edwards in a civil case brought by Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach County, Florida (Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG). The filing asserts as Fact #1 that Epstein has a 'sexual preference for young children,' citing a deposition from March 17, 2010. A footnote details that during this deposition, Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent regarding this subject, which Edwards argues allows for an adverse inference against Epstein.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Plaintiff |
Subject of the statement of facts; accused of having a sexual preference for young children; invoked 5th amendment du...
|
| Scott Rothstein | Defendant |
Sued individually by Epstein.
|
| Bradley J. Edwards | Defendant / Attorney |
Author of the Statement of Undisputed Facts; sued individually by Epstein.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit |
Court where the case is filed (Palm Beach County, Florida).
|
Timeline (1 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the court.
|
Relationships (2)
Plaintiff vs. Defendant in Case No.:50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG
Plaintiff vs. Defendant in Case No.:50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG
Key Quotes (3)
"Defendant Epstein has a sexual preference for young children."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013319.jpg
Quote #1
"When questioned about this subject at his deposition, Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent rather than make an incriminating admission."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013319.jpg
Quote #2
"Edwards is entitled to the adverse inference against Epstein that, had Epstein answered, the answer would have been unfavorable to him."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013319.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,505 characters)
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM
BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM
BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
Case No.:50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Plaintiff,
vs.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,
Defendants,
________________________________________/
________________________________________/
STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS
Defendant Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., offers the following specific facts as the undisputed
material facts in this case. Each of the following facts is numbered separately and individually to
facilitate Epstein’s required compliance with Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c) (“The adverse party shall
identify . . . any summary judgment evidence on which the adverse party relies.”). All
referenced exhibits and attachments have previously been filed with the Court and provided to
Epstein.
material facts in this case. Each of the following facts is numbered separately and individually to
facilitate Epstein’s required compliance with Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c) (“The adverse party shall
identify . . . any summary judgment evidence on which the adverse party relies.”). All
referenced exhibits and attachments have previously been filed with the Court and provided to
Epstein.
Sexual Abuse of Children By Epstein
1. Defendant Epstein has a sexual preference for young children. Deposition of
Jeffrey Epstein, Mar. 17, 2010, at 110 (hereinafter “Epstein Depo.”) (Deposition Attachment
#1).1
Jeffrey Epstein, Mar. 17, 2010, at 110 (hereinafter “Epstein Depo.”) (Deposition Attachment
#1).1
________________________________________
1 When questioned about this subject at his deposition, Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment right to
remain silent rather than make an incriminating admission. Accordingly, Edwards is entitled to the
adverse inference against Epstein that, had Epstein answered, the answer would have been unfavorable to
him. “[I]t is well-settled that the Fifth Amendment does not forbid adverse inferences against parties to
1 When questioned about this subject at his deposition, Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment right to
remain silent rather than make an incriminating admission. Accordingly, Edwards is entitled to the
adverse inference against Epstein that, had Epstein answered, the answer would have been unfavorable to
him. “[I]t is well-settled that the Fifth Amendment does not forbid adverse inferences against parties to
[Sticker: EXHIBIT A]
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013319
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document