DOJ-OGR-00017285.jpg
508 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
508 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between attorneys Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey. They are debating whether the testimony of Special Agent Jason Richards is a relevant response to a jury note concerning an FBI deposition and the cross-examination of a person named Carolyn. The Court ultimately overrules the request to include the testimony but agrees to redact the jury foreperson's name from the notes before making them public.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn |
Mentioned as the subject of a cross-examination and an FBI deposition.
|
|
| Jason Richards | Special Agent |
His testimony is being discussed for its relevance to a jury question.
|
| PAGLIUCA | Mr. |
An attorney arguing to add Special Agent Richards' testimony.
|
| COMEY | Ms. |
An attorney arguing against the relevance of Agent Richards' testimony.
|
| foreperson | foreperson |
The Court mentions redacting the foreperson's name from notes before making them public.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| FBI | government agency |
Mentioned in relation to "FBI deposition 3505-005".
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
Courtroom
THE COURT
MR. PAGLIUCA
MS. COMEY
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting company, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
Relationships (3)
MR. PAGLIUCA
→
professional
→
MS. COMEY
They are opposing counsel in a court proceeding, arguing different positions before the judge.
MR. PAGLIUCA
→
professional
→
THE COURT
Mr. Pagliuca makes a request to the Court, which the Court overrules.
MS. COMEY
→
professional
→
THE COURT
Ms. Comey presents an argument to the Court, which the Court appears to agree with ("It is.").
Key Quotes (5)
"We would like the FBI deposition 3505-005 referred to by the defense during the cross-examination of Carolyn."Source
— THE COURT
(The Court is reading a note, presumably from the jury.)
DOJ-OGR-00017285.jpg
Quote #1
"Your Honor, I don't see how Agent Richards' testimony is in any way responsive to that note."Source
— MS. COMEY
(Arguing against adding Agent Richards' testimony to the response.)
DOJ-OGR-00017285.jpg
Quote #2
"My request stands, your Honor, we add Special Agent Jason Richards to that."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Insisting on including the testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00017285.jpg
Quote #3
"Overruled. Because it's not what they've asked for."Source
— THE COURT
(Denying Mr. Pagliuca's request.)
DOJ-OGR-00017285.jpg
Quote #4
"I am reading the notes verbatim, but I will work on redacting the foreperson's name so they can be made public."Source
— THE COURT
(Concluding the discussion and explaining the next steps for the jury's notes.)
DOJ-OGR-00017285.jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,196 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 769 Filed 08/10/22 Page 7 of 19 3098
LCLVMAXT
LCLVMAXT
1 addition to the name Carolyn, we add "and the testimony of
2 Special Agent Jason Richards," assuming that's appropriately
3 responsive to the question.
4 THE COURT: I don't think it is, remembering fondly
5 when I said "period."
6 MR. PAGLIUCA: I understand, your Honor.
7 THE COURT: "We would like the FBI deposition 3505-005
8 referred to by the defense during the cross-examination of
9 Carolyn."
10 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I don't see how Agent
11 Richards' testimony is in any way responsive to that note. I
12 think the response that the Court already gave is fully
13 responsive.
14 THE COURT: It is.
15 MR. PAGLIUCA: My request stands, your Honor, we add
16 Special Agent Jason Richards to that.
17 THE COURT: Understood.
18 Overruled. Because it's not what they've asked for.
19 But we can be prepared, should they follow up with that
20 request.
21 MR. PAGLIUCA: We have the transcript here, your
22 Honor.
23 THE COURT: I am reading the notes verbatim, but I
24 will work on redacting the foreperson's name so they can be
25 made public.
2 Special Agent Jason Richards," assuming that's appropriately
3 responsive to the question.
4 THE COURT: I don't think it is, remembering fondly
5 when I said "period."
6 MR. PAGLIUCA: I understand, your Honor.
7 THE COURT: "We would like the FBI deposition 3505-005
8 referred to by the defense during the cross-examination of
9 Carolyn."
10 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I don't see how Agent
11 Richards' testimony is in any way responsive to that note. I
12 think the response that the Court already gave is fully
13 responsive.
14 THE COURT: It is.
15 MR. PAGLIUCA: My request stands, your Honor, we add
16 Special Agent Jason Richards to that.
17 THE COURT: Understood.
18 Overruled. Because it's not what they've asked for.
19 But we can be prepared, should they follow up with that
20 request.
21 MR. PAGLIUCA: We have the transcript here, your
22 Honor.
23 THE COURT: I am reading the notes verbatim, but I
24 will work on redacting the foreperson's name so they can be
25 made public.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017285
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document