EFTA00013258.pdf
76.7 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email thread
File Size:
76.7 KB
Summary
This document is an email thread from October 2020 regarding the privilege review of the 'Epstein SW [Search Warrant] returns' database. The participants discuss identifying and segregating privileged communications, specifically flagging emails related to attorney Jack Goldberger and materials from private investigators, including Roy Black, to determine if they are protected by attorney-client or work-product privilege.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject |
Subject of the search warrant database review; deceased at time of emails.
|
| Roy Black | Investigator / Attorney |
Identified in the email text as 'an investigator named Roy Black' whose communications were found in the database. (N...
|
| Jack Goldberger | Attorney |
Identified as someone who represented Epstein; his emails were flagged for privilege review.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein Estate |
Referenced as 'the estate' communicating directly with reviewers.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2020-10-12
Privilege review of Epstein Search Warrant (SW) database
N/A
Review team (names redacted)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of criminal investigation and related civil litigation mentioned.
|
Relationships (2)
Email states Goldberger 'represented Epstein'
Email states Epstein 'hired private investigators' and names Roy Black as one found in the database.
Key Quotes (4)
"In our review of this database, we have come across some communications (emails and reports)from private investigators— among others, an investigator named Roy Black."Source
EFTA00013258.pdf
Quote #1
"We don’t know whether these materials are privileged."Source
EFTA00013258.pdf
Quote #2
"The Goldberger hits have been moved out."Source
EFTA00013258.pdf
Quote #3
"I saw an email from the following email address that I wanted to flag for further privilege review, because it may belong to Jack Goldberger, who represented Epstein"Source
EFTA00013258.pdf
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,649 characters)
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>, [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Epstein SW returns
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 16:52:15 +0000
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>, [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Epstein SW returns
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 16:52:15 +0000
Hi [Redacted],
Thanks— from what I remember, the estate communicated with you directly about this, so I don’t remember getting a list.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 12, 2020, at 12:38 PM, [Redacted] <[Redacted]> wrote:
Hi [Redacted],
Hope you’re well too. Did Epstein’s lawyers also give you the list of attorneys? And can you remind me who they are?
Thanks, [Redacted]
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 11:50 AM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Epstein SW returns
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 11:50 AM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Epstein SW returns
Hi [Redacted],
Hope you’re doing well, and thanks very much for your help with privilege issues for this review. In our review of this database, we have come across some communications (emails and reports)from private investigators— among others, an investigator named Roy Black. We are generally aware that Epstein hired private investigators in connection with a criminal investigation and related civil litigation in Florida.
We don’t know whether these materials are privileged. Could you possibly confer with the estate attorneys to determine whether they are asserting a privilege over communications by private investigators? In the meantime, we will stop reviewing the database unless we hear from you otherwise.
Thanks very much,
[Redacted]
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 12, 2020, at 10:53 AM, [Redacted] <[Redacted]> wrote:
Thanks very much, [Redacted].
Thanks very much, [Redacted].
EFTA00013258
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 10:51 AM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein SW returns
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 10:51 AM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein SW returns
The Goldberger hits have been moved out.
Thanks, [Redacted]
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2020 5:14 PM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein SW returns
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2020 5:14 PM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein SW returns
That is [Redacted] email address. I’ll ask to have the Goldberger hits pulled now and will let you know when they are moved out.
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2020 12:52 PM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Epstein SW returns
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2020 12:52 PM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Epstein SW returns
Hi [Redacted],
For the Epstein search warrant database, I saw an email from the following email address that I wanted to flag for further privilege review, because it may belong to Jack Goldberger, who represented Epstein:
[Redacted]
Thanks,
[Redacted]
[Redacted Block]
EFTA00013259
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document